Search for: "People v. Wells (1970)"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,011
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jun 2025, 6:30 am
(Since Kersch wrote, we have seen Adrian Vermeule’s well-known argument for a “common [read post]
30 May 2025, 11:27 am
”6 And further: A 1970 legislative acorn has grown over the years into a judicial oak that has hindered infrastructure development “under the guise” of just a little more process. . . . [read post]
27 May 2025, 8:29 am
The grant of an application for stay by a 6-3 Supreme Court majority in Trump v. [read post]
27 May 2025, 7:27 am
Rather than adhere to the federal rules for all elections, Arizona implemented a two-tiered system: people who provide DPOC can vote in state and federal elections, and people who do not can vote in federal elections only. [read post]
27 May 2025, 3:54 am
These principles are foundational to any well-functioning legal system’s procedural laws concerning service. [read post]
22 May 2025, 12:31 pm
Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit dismissed the complaint, finding no plausible discrimination claim and ruling that the pork producers’ claim that the law imposed excessive burdens on interstate commerce under the balancing test of the 1970 case Pike v. [read post]
5 May 2025, 9:17 am
Nonetheless, where rights were acknowledged (two well-known early examples being in Winters v. [read post]
5 May 2025, 7:46 am
“I’ve never seen a protest with this many people in suits. [read post]
5 May 2025, 4:00 am
In 1954, the Supreme Court famously decided Brown v. [read post]
30 Apr 2025, 4:00 am
" The two topics fit well together. [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 7:06 pm
Lau v. [read post]
26 Mar 2025, 9:01 pm
Lumber Co. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 7:16 pm
It was a central feature of major condemnation reform in the 1970s and 80s, exemplified in the federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 (“Policy Act”). [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 10:43 am
Koi Nation of Northern California v. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 11:43 am
Kelly, 397 US 254 (1970). [read post]
16 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm
In addition, if profits can be maximized by deforestation or releasing methane or other greenhouse gases as well, then profits must again take precedence. [read post]
15 Mar 2025, 6:34 pm
Underlying all of that is a challenge to the broad understanding and application of the lessons of Korematsu v. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 10:24 am
Supreme Court, when it got around to considering these issues in the 1970s, generally disagreed with scholars like Michelman.The Court rejected Michelman’s views in Dandridge v. [read post]
22 Feb 2025, 6:07 pm
S. 254, 262, and n. 8 (1970) (citing C. [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 2:30 pm
From today's decision in Caggiano v. [read post]
