Search for: "People v. Fields (1983)"
Results 1 - 20
of 204
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2016, 2:46 pm
The guy was diverting the water to irrigate his marijuana field. [read post]
16 May 2007, 6:18 am
Allen v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:16 pm
Gates, 462 U.S. 213 (1983), in the quotation that follows. [read post]
21 Dec 2010, 11:21 pm
(See also People v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 5:45 pm
But because states cannot be defendants to claims under 42 U.S.C. 1983, the New York law has the effect (although not the purpose) of barring a certain subset of 1983 claims from the state courts. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:28 am
The field studies were designed to address this question. [read post]
20 Sep 2021, 4:20 pm
(See Peck v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 4:32 pm
Even when under the influence of alcohol, people can handle a single focused attention task fairly well. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided Ziglar v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:30 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court decided Ziglar v. [read post]
21 Oct 2008, 1:03 pm
In Lava Records v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 12:00 am
Mikulewicz, 462 A.2d 497, 501 (Me. 1983). [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 11:04 am
State 479 A.2d 903 (1983). [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 7:27 pm
Evans v. [read post]
25 Jan 2021, 9:36 am
State v. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Ward dissent, which ignored the bright line between habeas and 42 U.S.C. sec. 1983 that Scalia himself had drawn in Heck v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 2:26 pm
(Supreme Court 2020) The question in this case is whether the Federal Reserve Banks are people. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 9:09 am
Moore v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:07 pm
(citation omitted).2 Öcalan v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 5:43 am
The NAB v. [read post]
