Search for: "People v. J.S." Results 1 - 20 of 51
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Aug 2014, 4:21 pm
I'll not comment on the substance of this opinion, other than to articulate my view that the Court of Appeal's opinion is absolutely right, and that it'd have been a travesty if the relevant procedural rule was the one advanced by the Attorney General. [read post]
15 Jul 2019, 11:46 am
Here's the rare case involving a juvenile offense that occurred entirely within Contra Costa County and that's nonetheless decided in the San Diego Superior Court with a San Diego judge and an appeal in the Fourth Appellate District. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 4:14 pm by NARF
Arctic Village Council (Voting Rights; Absentee Ballots) In the Interest of J.S., G.S., and I.F., Children (Indian Child Welfare Act) In re Hotchkiss (Indian Child Welfare Act) U.S. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 2:02 pm by Eric Goldman
Finally, the state tried a general argument that we all know what’s going on: “Defendants sought to structure their business to obtain maximum profits from the illegal sex trade,” citing J.S. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 4:04 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Now we move on to the quarterfinals of Category 3, People and Parties. #1 Hon. [read post]
6 May 2013, 7:38 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
He loses the case because courts are not allowed to entertain challenges like this.The case is J.S. v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 3:17 pm by Lawrence Cunningham
The front page of the New York Times (May 31, 2011) contains a great story by Peter Lattman, quoting me, on the pending case of Simkin v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 7:03 am
For a somewhat sympathetic discussion of his tenure with the East Indian Company, see chapters 16, “Utilitarianism and Bureaucracy: The Views of J.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 3:27 am
Dennison, respondent-appellant NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal PracticeMotion to Dismiss Charge of Endangering Welfare of Child for Facial Insufficiency Granted People v. [read post]