Search for: "People v. Neuberger"
Results 1 - 20
of 163
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jan 2024, 2:28 am
Zöchling v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:28 pm
An allocation scheme must be framed so as to give reasonable preference to applicants who fall within the categories set out in s.166A(3), over those who do not: Ahmad, Lord Neuberger, (39). [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 1:50 am
The Supreme Court unanimously held that Ukraine had a justiciable and arguable defence of duress based on Russia’s alleged threats to Ukrainian people or property. [read post]
19 Mar 2023, 12:56 pm
As famously expressed by Knight Bruce V-C in Walter v Selfe (1851) 4 De G & Sm 315, 322, the question is whether the interference ought to be considered a material inconvenience “not merely according to elegant or dainty modes and habits of living, but according to plain and sober and simple notions among the English people”; see also Barr v Biffa Waste Services Ltd (2013) QB 455, para 36(ii). [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 9:36 am
Driver v CPS The second development is Knowles J’s decision in Driver v CPS [2022] EWHC 2500 (KB) which involved an email sent to a member of the public by a CPS lawyer about a criminal investigation in which the claimant politician was a suspect. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:21 am
Insofar as Mostyn J had previously determined otherwise in cases such as DL v SL [2015] EWHC 2621 (Fam); [2016] 1 WLR 1259 and Appleton v Gallagher, he was wrong: Gallagher at [33]-[34]. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:01 am
Neuberger made the introductions. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 12:52 pm
As Deputy National Security Advisor for Cyber and Emerging Technology Anne Neuberger put it in a recent interview, “[T]he U.S. government’s policy has been very clear that we highly discourage the payment of ransom because it’s what is driving this ecosystem. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 4:38 pm
IndiaKush Kalra v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 11:40 am
The Biden transition has already announced that Anne Neuberger, a highly respected senior career civilian employee of the National Security Agency, will serve on the NSC staff as deputy national security adviser for cyber and emerging technology. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:08 pm
Title II – Assistance to Individuals, Families, and Businesses Foley Title II Contacts: Carrie Hoffman, Mark Neuberger, Jacqueline Hayduk, Michael Abbott, Tim Voigtman Subtitle A – Unemployment Insurance; Chapter 1 – Continued Assistance to Unemployed Workers Subchapter I – Extension of CARES Act Unemployment Provisions. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 4:30 pm
UgandaHuman Rights Network Uganda v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 6:43 am
Irish constitutional law does indeed subscribe to a hierarchy of rights in some cases (see, eg, People (DPP) v Shaw [1982] IR 1, 63 (Kenny J)); but that is usually unprincipled and largely unworkable (see, eg, Attorney General v X [1992] 1 IR 1, [1992] IESC 1 (5 March 1992) [138]-[139] (McCarthy J), [184] (Egan J); Sunday Newspapers Ltd v Gilchrist and Rogers [2017] IESC 18 (23 March 2017) [36]… [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 4:02 pm
The recent case of Ameyaw v McGoldrick [2020] EWHC 1741 (QB) offers a cautionary tale about McKenzie Friends and what they can and can’t do for you in court. [read post]
30 Apr 2020, 12:48 pm
Lord Neuberger, the president of the court at the time, explained that the “archive will help people see the background to decisions made” in the court. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm
Lady Hale took up appointment as President of The Supreme Court in September 2017, succeeding Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:58 pm
The case of ABC v. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 3:11 am
Since PJS, and now also since Sir Cliff Richard v BBC, a new path appears to be being forged for privacy and freedom of expression. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 6:19 am
The panel included two of the Supreme Court Judges who had decided Actavis – Lord Neuberger and Lord Sumption as well as leading patents judges from Germany, the Netherlands and the US and attracted an audience of over 600 people. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 1:02 am
Tessa] Significant News A big news item for me and my homelessness colleagues was announced last week, ending a court process that has taken 2 years to decide what Lord Neuberger meant by the word ‘Significantly’ in the appeal hearing for Hotak v. [read post]
