Search for: "Petition of Smith"
Results 1 - 20
of 3,013
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2024, 10:46 am
Judge Oldham wrote for the court, joined by Judges Jones, Smith, Elrod, Willett, Ho Duncan, Englehardt and Wilson. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 9:43 am
But when they got to the Supreme Court, the cert petition came in and it said, basically, “is the president absolutely immune for acts he committed as president? [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 9:03 am
Judge Edith Jones wrote for the majority, joined by Chief Judge Richman and Judges Smith, Elrod, Southwick, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson. [read post]
19 Jul 2024, 3:00 am
Cannon concluded that special counsel Jack Smith’s appointment violated the Appointments Clause of the Constitution. [read post]
17 Jul 2024, 9:46 am
However, Special Counsel Jack Smith's prosecution of Donald Trump presents just that opportunity for Morrison to be overruled. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
"As this language must be strictly construed in view "of the constitutional provision against the expenditure of public funds absent express statutory authority", "overtime payments are not duly authorized or considered as salary within the meaning of General Municipal Law §90 unless paid pursuant to 'an overtime plan setting forth in detail the terms, conditions and remuneration for such employment'".In this instance the Appellate Division annulled so… [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:00 am
"As this language must be strictly construed in view "of the constitutional provision against the expenditure of public funds absent express statutory authority", "overtime payments are not duly authorized or considered as salary within the meaning of General Municipal Law §90 unless paid pursuant to 'an overtime plan setting forth in detail the terms, conditions and remuneration for such employment'".In this instance the Appellate Division annulled so… [read post]
12 Jul 2024, 3:00 am
The co-defendant, Walt Nauta, who works as a personal aide to Trump, had accused prosecutors in the office of the special counsel, Jack Smith, of unfairly indicting him because he declined to help their efforts to build a case against the former president by testifying against him in front of a grand jury. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 7:21 am
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 1:38 am
Lentner & Weronika Cenin, Daniel Billy et al v Australia (Torres Strait Islanders Petition): Climate change inaction as a human rights violation [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 3:00 am
Thomas argued both that the special counsel’s office needs to be established by Congress and Smith needed to be confirmed by the Senate. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 7:41 am
You can read the majority and dissenting opinions in the Fifth Circuit here, and the petition, response, and reply here. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 3:11 pm
Smith, 23-167Issues: (1) Whether Hall v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 4:39 am
In Smith v. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 12:30 pm
New Jersey AG: Hey Smith & Wesson, nice-looking documents you got there, mind if we take a look? [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 10:11 pm
She turns away all emergency petitions on the shadow docket (unless they're from the Fifth Circuit). [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 11:52 am
In a prior post, I have analyzed the justices’ treatment of the questions presented in the petition in Smith v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 7:29 am
This post summarizes Smith v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"In determining what constitutes . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement, we must look to the substance of the transaction and not to what the parties may label it" (Matter of Green v Regan, 103 AD2d 878, 878-879 [3d Dept 1984]; see Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d at 1210; Matter of Chichester v DiNapoli, 108 AD3d 924, 925 [3d Dept 2013]). [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
"In determining what constitutes . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement, we must look to the substance of the transaction and not to what the parties may label it" (Matter of Green v Regan, 103 AD2d 878, 878-879 [3d Dept 1984]; see Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d at 1210; Matter of Chichester v DiNapoli, 108 AD3d 924, 925 [3d Dept 2013]). [read post]
