Search for: "Petition of Smith" Results 1 - 20 of 3,008
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jul 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
The co-defendant, Walt Nauta, who works as a personal aide to Trump, had accused prosecutors in the office of the special counsel, Jack Smith, of unfairly indicting him because he declined to help their efforts to build a case against the former president by testifying against him in front of a grand jury. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 7:21 am by Alex Phipps
These summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to the present. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 1:38 am by Jacob Katz Cogan
Lentner & Weronika Cenin, Daniel Billy et al v Australia (Torres Strait Islanders Petition): Climate change inaction as a human rights violation       [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Thomas argued both that the special counsel’s office needs to be established by Congress and Smith needed to be confirmed by the Senate. [read post]
2 Jul 2024, 7:41 am by Eugene Volokh
You can read the majority and dissenting opinions in the Fifth Circuit here, and the petition, response, and reply here. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
New Jersey AG: Hey Smith & Wesson, nice-looking documents you got there, mind if we take a look? [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 10:11 pm by Josh Blackman
She turns away all emergency petitions on the shadow docket (unless they're from the Fifth Circuit). [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 11:52 am
              In a prior post, I have analyzed the justices’ treatment of the questions presented in the petition in Smith v. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"In determining what constitutes . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement, we must look to the substance of the transaction and not to what the parties may label it" (Matter of Green v Regan, 103 AD2d 878, 878-879 [3d Dept 1984]; see Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d at 1210; Matter of Chichester v DiNapoli, 108 AD3d 924, 925 [3d Dept 2013]). [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"In determining what constitutes . . . compensation paid in anticipation of retirement, we must look to the substance of the transaction and not to what the parties may label it" (Matter of Green v Regan, 103 AD2d 878, 878-879 [3d Dept 1984]; see Matter of Smith v DiNapoli, 167 AD3d at 1210; Matter of Chichester v DiNapoli, 108 AD3d 924, 925 [3d Dept 2013]). [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 3:07 pm
  The petition presented this question because the Arizona appellate court noted that Smith “could have called [Rast] to the stand and questioned her, but he chose not to do so. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 3:12 pm by Amy Howe
Smith did not raise that issue in his petition for review, Kagan wrote. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm by John Elwood
The solicitor general petitioned for review on the basis of that disagreement. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal Supreme Court Rules California Man Can’t Trademark ‘Trump Too Small’ Associated Press News – Mark Sherman | Published: 6/13/2024 The U.S. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 12:55 pm by John Elwood
In their petitions, both Porat and Kousisis renew their claims. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
District Court Judge Aileen Cannon is planning on holding a sprawling hearing on Donald Trump’s request to declare Jack Smith’s appointment as special counsel invalid, signaling the judge could be more willing than any other trial judge to veto the special prosecutor’s authority. [read post]