Search for: "Plante v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 4,069
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2018, 9:12 am
Campbell and James V. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:21 am
Ruttle Plant Hire Ltd v Secretary of State for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (No 3) Court of Appeal “Mistakes in a supplier's invoice did not enable the paying party to avoid late payment interest penalties. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 2:11 am
Ruttle Plant Hire Ltd v Secretary of State for Environment Food & Rural Affairs (No 3) [2009] EWCA Civ 97; [2009] WLR (D) 75 “A ‘notice of an amount of the debt’ within the meaning of s4(5) of the Late Payment of Commercial Debt (Interest) Act 1998 did not have to be correct before the court [...] [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 9:27 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on Monday, July 26, 2010, in State of North Carolina v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:27 am
As the world anxiously watches the nuclear crisis unfold in Japan, there are growing concerns about the safety of nuclear power plants right here in the United States. [read post]
18 Oct 2024, 7:55 am
In West Virginia v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:15 am
Prometheus and Alice Corp Pty Ltd v. [read post]
EPA Releases Draft Guidance for Pesticide Registrants on Plant Regulator Label Claims, Including Pla
27 Mar 2019, 7:46 am
EPA states that the draft guidance is intended to “provide guidance on identifying product label claims that are considered to be plant regulator claims” by EPA under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and thereby distinguish claims that would not subject plant biostimulants (PBS) to regulation under FIFRA as plant regulators. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 9:02 am
<> State of Nebraska v. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 7:45 am
With regards generation shifting, states will have greater latitude than the federal government to force dirty power plants to close. [read post]
13 May 2014, 10:00 am
Supreme Court Upholds EPA's Cross-State Air Pollution Rule in EPA v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 4:33 am
BE (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 540; [2008] WLR (D) 159 “An Iranian soldier who had been ordered in peacetime to plant land mines liable to kill or maim innocent civilians, and who had deserted, was entitled to international protection as a refugee since the order constituted a requirement that he commit a grave violation of human rights which could further be characterised as ‘gross’ and ‘an… [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:52 pm
Supreme Court ruled, in Massachusetts v. [read post]
31 May 2020, 10:00 pm
The May 2020 decision is a blow to the Agricultural industry who was hopeful for a similar outcome in Europe to that of the United States Supreme Court here in JEM Ag Supply v Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., 534 U.S. 124, (2001), litigated by the attorneys here at MVS. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 2:37 pm
United States, 476 U.S. 227 (1986), and United States v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 1:25 pm
This is the first air permit issued in the United States for such a plant in over a decade, according to Jefferson Renewable Energy, the project developer. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 2:00 am
, et al., v. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 4:43 pm
Granny Purps, Inc. v County of Santa Cruz, 53 Cal. [read post]
24 Jun 2005, 1:12 pm
The policy upheld in State of New York v. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 7:19 am
On August 27, the Eighth Circuit (Wollman, Smith, Benton) issued a decision in United States v. [read post]
