Search for: "Price v. Cohen" Results 1 - 20 of 192
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2020, 1:21 pm by Unknown
Looks to content (promoting demand for a product/service or denigrating competitor’s product; specific product references; information about type, price, quality or other attributes, including health benefits); means used to publish the speech (would it be recognized as advertising); and speaker’s economic motivation for disseminating speech. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:59 am by Rebecca Tushnet
This falls apart in other situations, such as Fox v. [read post]
22 Nov 2019, 6:59 am
 Earlier this year the US Congressional hearings into drug prices in the US hit the headlines. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 6:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Q: rate of innovation v. direction of innovation—are we even capable of directional? [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 5:41 am by Caroline Shaw
Unexpected, to me at least, was a regular acceptance, among politicians, lawyers, and journalists alike, that defamation law was the necessary price to pay for a freer press: censure, rather than censorship. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
" And from AHA Perspectives, Katherine Benton-Cohen (Georgetown University) on How Experts and Their Facts Created Immigration Restriction.Weekend Roundup is a weekly feature compiled by all the Legal History bloggers. [read post]
12 Apr 2019, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
But if TM law is a law of competition, that matters; why be so comfortable w/allowing parties opportunistic definitions in litigation v. mark definition? [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 9:00 am by Staff
Subsequent to the FDA approval of Epidiolox, The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) issued a Final Order placing “FDA-approved drugs that contain CBD derived from cannabis and no more than 0.1 percent tetrahydrocannabinols” [such as Epidiolox] in Schedule V of the Controlled Substances Act,”  “Schedule V drugs are considered to have the lowest potential for abuse compared to other scheduled drugs and a low potential for psychological or physical… [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  Nicklin J ruled that the reports meant that the claimant had “procured or authorised a corrupt payment of $400,000 to be made to Michael Cohen, the personal lawyer of Donald Trump, to extend a brief meeting between the claimant and President Trump… into more substantial talks”. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Samuel Estreicher and David Moosmann
This is in keeping with the central purpose of federal campaign finance law, as the US Supreme Court put it in Buckley v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Perhaps a court should fashion such a rule--thus overruling Clinton v. [read post]