Search for: "Price v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 13,180
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2024, 12:11 pm by centerforartlaw
Broderick on August 28.[42] Most recently, in an order filed by United States Magistrate Judge Sarah Netburn on February 12, 2024, the Court addressed a pending privilege dispute over which state’s law should apply to resolve the documents.[43] Another issue was whether the attorney-client privilege between the Estate and its counsel exten [read post]
13 May 2024, 4:50 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Thus, in Auerbach v Bennett (47 NY2d 619 [1979]), New York’s highest court held that courts have the power in shareholder derivative litigation to grant unnamed interested shareholders leave to intervene – even for the first time on appeal. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
This is because the FTC states that consumers would not switch to mass-market or true luxury handbags “in sufficient volumes to render the price increase unprofitable. [read post]
6 May 2024, 8:39 am by centerforartlaw
Additionally, most negotiations had to take place quickly and often in auctions promoted by the Nazis, resulting in property being sold at prices below their actual market value. [read post]
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:52 am by Brian Clark
United States, 432 F.2d 1052, 1055 (3d Cir. 1970) [17] The Stalker Corp. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 3:29 pm by Stuart Kaplow
Clean Energy House Bill 1296 (passed) requires the PSC to resuscitate the State’s offshore wind power generating efforts by opening an additional round of offshore wind project proceedings that will be limited to evaluating revised project schedules, sizes, or pricing for a previously approved project. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 9:08 am by John Elwood
Wullschleger and Brewer brought a putative class action in Missouri state court, alleging that the “prescription” designation is misleading because the Food and Drug Administration never evaluated the product, and that they were injured by the food’s higher price. [read post]
26 Apr 2024, 3:51 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” (Ackerman v Price Waterhouse, 84 NY2d 535, 541 [1994] [citations omitted].) [read post]