Search for: "ROGERS v. UNITED STATES" Results 1 - 20 of 1,651
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jul 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Bruen, and the tech and privacy implications of Dobbs v. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 7:13 am by admin
For example, he raises and explains the problem encountered for causal inference by small relative risks: “Small relative risks of the order of 2:1 or even less are what are likely to be observed, like the risk now recorded for childhood leukemia and exposure to magnetic fields of 0.4 µT or more (Ahlbom et al. 2000) that are seldom encountered in the United Kingdom. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 6:01 am by Benjamin Pollard
Kyleanne Hunter discussed the potential impacts that overturning Roe v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 3:23 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Circuit, about which the NYT writes: At least two climate cases are pending before the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 1:23 pm by Benjamin Pollard
Jolynn Dellinger and Stephanie Pell argued that if Roe v. [read post]
11 Jun 2022, 9:11 am by Benjamin Pollard
Roger Parloff discussed the legal landscape for Section 3 of the 14th amendment cases in light of the ruling in Cawthorn v. [read post]
Representatives Frank Pallone, Cathy McMorris Rodgers, and Senator Roger Wicker released a “discussion draft” of a federal data privacy bill entitled the “American Data Privacy and Protection Act” (the “Draft Bill”), which would impact the data privacy and cybersecurity practices of virtually every business and not-for-profit organization in the United States. [read post]
Representatives Frank Pallone, Cathy McMorris Rodgers, and Senator Roger Wicker released a “discussion draft” of a federal data privacy bill entitled the “American Data Privacy and Protection Act” (the “Draft Bill”), which would impact the data privacy and cybersecurity practices of virtually every business and not-for-profit organization in the United States. [read post]
Representatives Frank Pallone, Cathy McMorris Rodgers, and Senator Roger Wicker released a “discussion draft” of a federal data privacy bill entitled the “American Data Privacy and Protection Act” (the “Draft Bill”), which would impact the data privacy and cybersecurity practices of virtually every business and not-for-profit organization in the United States. [read post]
Representatives Frank Pallone, Cathy McMorris Rodgers, and Senator Roger Wicker released a “discussion draft” of a federal data privacy bill entitled the “American Data Privacy and Protection Act” (the “Draft Bill”), which would impact the data privacy and cybersecurity practices of virtually every business and not-for-profit organization in the United States. [read post]
8 Jun 2022, 11:56 am by Benjamin Pollard
Roger Parloff discussed the legal landscape for Section 3 of the 14th amendment cases in light of the ruling in Cawthorn v. [read post]
25 May 2022, 8:40 am by Jennifer Davis
United States, 320 U.S. 81 (1943) and Yasui v. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:38 pm by Katherine Pompilio
  Kurup and Pompilio posted the Supreme Court’s ruling in Patel v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:13 am by Florian Mueller
Google described it as a mere clarification, though I would agree with Epic and others that in reality it constituted a policy change, an about-face.By "[f]or the time being" I meant that this is just temporary, like a moratorium:At the very latest, this agreement terminates when the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has entered final judgment in, or otherwise disposed of, Epic Games v. [read post]