Search for: "Rogers v. Rogers" Results 1 - 20 of 5,350
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
Source: USPTO  Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Verret (George Mason University), and Greg Lawrence (Lawrence Law), on Monday, April 29, 2024 Tags: Insider trading, Punawat, SEC, SEC v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am
Verret (George Mason University), and Greg Lawrence (Lawrence Law), on Monday, April 29, 2024 Tags: Insider trading, Punawat, SEC, SEC v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:04 am by Barbara Moreno
Wanda Little Fenimore, The Rhetorical Road to Brown v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
To give the reader some idea of the artificial flavor of Egilman’s pomposity, paragraph 8 of his remarkable declaration avers” “My views on the scientific standards for the determination of cause-effect relationships (medical epistemology) have been cited by the Massachusetts Supreme Court (Vassallo v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 10:01 am by Norman L. Eisen
The motion cataloged Trump’s long history of verbally attacking people involved in legal proceedings against him and his allies, offering examples from this case, the D.C. federal criminal prosecution, the Georgia state prosecution, the NY civil fraud case, and the prosecution of Roger Stone. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 4:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Love, did not address the specific assertions made by Rogers (see Longhi v Lewit, 187 AD3d at 878). [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Dispositions de dérogation Les articles 33 et 34 de la Loi sur la laïcité de l’État reprennent respectivement le libellé de l’article 52 in fine de la Charte des droits et libertés de la personne et de l’article 33 de la charte canadienne, lesquels confèrent au législateur le pouvoir de déroger à certaines de leurs propres dispositions. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 8:41 am by Ned Foley
Other participants were Quinta Jurecic and Roger Parloff of Lawfare and Gerald Magliocca, who has done such important… Continue reading The post Lawfare podcast on Trump v. [read post]