Search for: "STATE v STRAUSS"
Results 1 - 20
of 395
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2009, 11:27 pm
Strauss (Columbia Law School) has posted Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 9:32 am
This was the position clearly taken by the Court in 1940, in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2019, 9:12 am
Almost a decade ago, in Toyota v. [read post]
8 May 2012, 9:37 am
Vanity responded to the letter by filing for declaratory relief against the denim giant stating that the "V" design on the back of its jeans is "visually distinctive" from Levi's jeans and that "Levi Strauss does not have the right to prevent Vanity from using a stylized version of the letter 'V' in connection with its pocket designs. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 6:03 pm
United States and Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 10:07 pm
[Post by Venkat Balasubramani] Levi Strauss & Co v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 11:46 am
In United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 6:45 pm
Bank v.Atlantic States v. [read post]
19 May 2011, 5:50 am
See Van Aggelen v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 4:01 pm
” The case is Levi Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 4:30 am
05/28/09 WordinEdgewise:An unidentified "legal reader" of Andrew Sullivan's Daily Dish explains why he or she thinks Strauss v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 10:59 am
" Compare Levi Strauss v. [read post]
Strauss Charges Texas Legislature to Look at Local Ordinances Governing Surface Use in Barnett Shale
31 Mar 2010, 4:21 pm
Texas Citizens for a Safe Future and Clean Water v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 6:24 am
The Ohio State University v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 3:45 pm
State of California, S168066; City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
5 Nov 2007, 12:13 am
One recent example is Romer v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 2:16 pm
Levi Strauss in Trademark Infringement dispute over “V” pocket design. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 11:17 am
Rev.), Chevron v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 9:50 pm
Maryland or Brown v. [read post]
22 Jul 2016, 7:55 pm
By 2008 U.S. courts deemed the area to be under de facto sovereignty of the United States (Boumediene v. [read post]