Search for: "Salas v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 149
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2024, 11:41 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
Judge Wright puts it plainly stating that ICE's practice can be more accurately termed "knock and arrests" and "violate[s] the Fourth Amendment. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 5:07 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
State of California (5th—F084367) Residential Employees Performing In-Home Supportive Services—Employment Relationship with State of California—Vicarious Liability—Court of Appeal, affirming trial court’s dismissal order, held that State of California (State) had no employment relationship (either as joint or special employer) with In-Home Supportive… Digests of WCAB Decisions Denied Judicial Review Innovative Work Comp… [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 5:33 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Code of Civil Procedure section 2094 states as follows: (a) An oath, affirmation, or declaration in an action or a proceeding, may be administered by obtaining an affirmative response to one of the following questions: (1) “Do you solemnly state that the evidence you shall give in this issue (or matter) shall be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you God? [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Georgetown Law observes the centennial of United States v. [read post]
24 May 2022, 12:10 pm
A couple recent articles from'These Schools of Interpretation Are Folderol': State Chief Justices Discuss How They Analyze the LawHow appellate analytics give law firms a competitive edgeCLA's recent video program on the famous Mendez v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 5:01 am by Etta Lanum
By 1981, the Supreme Court was reviewing a sex discrimination case titled Rostker v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 1:43 am by JR Chaves
Un reciente auto de la Sala tercera del Tribunal Supremo de 25 de febrero de 2021(rec.1481/2019) constituye un espléndido ejemplo del buen hacer jurisdiccional con una formación de sala especializada y con ideas claras, bajo la pluma de un ponente extraordinario, Don Francisco José Navarro Sanchís, que ya nos había demostrado en el pasado su destreza expositiva, lucidez argumental y su defensa de las libertades y derechos, con elegancia y sin… [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 12:39 am by JR Chaves
Además, al igual que el malvado virus no entiende de fronteras autonómicas ni locales, tampoco el ciudadano entendería que similares daños sanitarios se aprecien con distinto criterio y valoración de sus consecuencias según Juzgados o Salas distintas. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 12:32 am by JR Chaves
Aquí hemos de reparar en que la Sala no fija doctrina casacional sino que se limita a resolver un recurso frente a un acto del Consejo de Ministros. [read post]