Search for: "Smith v. United States Air Force" Results 1 - 20 of 150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2010, 2:41 am by Adam Wagner
R (Smith) v Secretary of State for Defence & Anor [2010] UKSC 29 – Read judgment The Supreme Court has ruled by a 6-3 majority that the Human Rights Act does not apply on the battlefield and soldiers are not automatically entitled to inquests arising from deaths in foreign conflicts. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:32 pm by Lawrence Solum
Charles (Government of the United States of America - Air Force) has posted The Faces of the Second Amendment Outside the Home: History Versus Ahistorical Standards of Review (Cleveland State Law Review, Vol. 60, No. 1, 2012) on SSRN. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 1:54 pm
" United States v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 1:29 pm by Jeff Foust
However, she added that “if the Government receives any indication, however, that purchases from or payment of money to NPO Energomash by ULS, ULA, or the United States Air Force will directly or indirectly contravene Executive Order 13,661, the Government will inform the court immediately. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 8:45 am by David Wagner
This post is based on input and analysis from Reed Smith attorneys across the United States. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 12:00 am by Sex Offender Issues
FISHER At all relevant times, Meredith was a member of the United States Navy stationed at Marine Corps Air Station, Miramar (Miramar). [read post]
19 May 2007, 10:12 am
Rather, he invites the State to violate two of the most basic norms of a civilized society - that the State's penal authority be invoked only where necessary to serve the ends of justice, not the ends of a particular individual, and that punishment be imposed only where the State has adequate assurance that the punishment is justified.United States Supreme Court Justice, 1990(1)Robert Comer, Christopher Newton and Elijah Page have something in common, aside… [read post]
19 May 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
A case such as Smith v Trafford Housing Trust is less clear cut. [read post]
3 May 2012, 5:15 am by admin
Most recently in 2010, in United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 10:00 am by Zachary Spilman
United States, No. 12-229, (recently filed) Easton v. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by Matthew Chagares
EPA intended its good neighbor rule to reduce the amount of air pollution traveling from upwind states, where pollution is emitted, to downwind states, which receive the air pollution. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 4:02 pm by admin
Authored by: Katherine Smith Dedrick (kdedrick@RiskWorldwide.com) The growing awareness in the United States regarding carbon emissions and their effect on the environment and weather patterns, have produced an increase in environmental litigation and some important decisions from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]