Search for: "Smith v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 4,651
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2025, 6:50 am
The court noted that the Fourth Circuit had revisited this issue post-Bruen in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2025, 2:03 am
Google agreed to pay nearly $1.4 billion to the state of Texas to settle allegations of violating the data privacy rights of state residents. [read post]
9 May 2025, 1:19 am
United States, 319 U. [read post]
6 May 2025, 5:01 am
United States (N.D. [read post]
3 May 2025, 2:19 pm
Ball State University (7th Cir. 1999); Wozniak v. [read post]
2 May 2025, 6:13 pm
Ganias, and the Fifth Circuit's ruling in United States v. [read post]
30 Apr 2025, 3:27 pm
Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes (Criminal Jurisdiction; Tribal Conviction; PL 280) United States v. [read post]
“This Judge is a Hero”: Democratic Politicians and Judges Praise Judge Dugan and Call for Resistance
29 Apr 2025, 3:25 am
As Justice Louis Brandeis stated in Olmstead v. [read post]
28 Apr 2025, 1:46 pm
Hartwell, 6 Wall. 385 (1868), and United States v. [read post]
28 Apr 2025, 1:57 am
Graham Smith has published his submission to the Ministry of Justice’s Call for Evidence on computer evidence in criminal proceedings. [read post]
26 Apr 2025, 9:10 am
Hartwell and the 1888 case United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2025, 9:05 pm
After the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
21 Apr 2025, 6:34 am
State v. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 10:32 am
I see an analogy to United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 5:50 am
DOJ might have relied on Schuck and Smith when appealing to “consent” in this fashion, but in any case, its quotation from Elk v. [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 6:28 am
Me.) in Doe v. [read post]
9 Apr 2025, 6:30 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2025, 10:33 am
United States (2022) addressed financial penalties for failing to report foreign bank accounts. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 7:00 am
Consent in Dred Scott Written by a slaveholder and joined by five other slaveholders, Dred Scott v. [read post]
2 Apr 2025, 8:21 am
On March 22nd, a different kind of Presidential Memorandum, “Preventing Abuses of the Legal System and the Federal Court”, directed the Attorney General “to seek sanctions against attorneys and law firms who engage in frivolous, unreasonable, and vexatious litigation against the United States or in matters before executive departments and agencies of the United States”, to refer for disciplinary action lawyers whose conduct in Federal Court… [read post]
