Search for: "State v. Downs"
Results 1 - 20
of 36,150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2025, 3:26 pm
§ 363(b) — Federal bankruptcy law requiring notice and hearing for selling property outside the ordinary course of business MDNC Local Rule 4001-1(f) — Middle District of NC rule specifically requiring a motion to sell property unless your plan explicitly provides otherwise Trantham v. [read post]
20 May 2025, 12:23 pm
Cutter v. [read post]
20 May 2025, 11:48 am
Africa should rise above the tendency for top-down imposition of solutions for AMR, but instead contribute to the AMR reduction agenda through a win-win approach. [read post]
20 May 2025, 8:40 am
In Bostock v. [read post]
20 May 2025, 8:17 am
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
20 May 2025, 7:55 am
United States interpreting the Federal Rules of Evidence, Souter offered an expansive view of what counts as “relevant” evidence at trial. [read post]
20 May 2025, 6:15 am
The Supreme Court confirmed this limit in R v Sinclair. [read post]
19 May 2025, 11:38 am
D&O Diary readers may be aware that the impetus, in part, of Delaware SB 21 (SB 21) passed in March 2024 was the investor lawsuit filed against Elon Musk and Tesla Tornetta v. [read post]
19 May 2025, 9:54 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
19 May 2025, 8:26 am
From N.Y. trial court judge Lisa Headley in Doe v. [read post]
19 May 2025, 6:30 am
In Carlill v. [read post]
19 May 2025, 3:52 am
New York County’s newest commercial division Justice Anar Rathod Patel’s recent decision, Lignel v Butler, No. 650791/2025 (Sup Ct, New York County 2025), holds the line: deadlock (and allegations of member oppression) are insufficient to state a claim for dissolution of an LLC that is operating in accordance with its stated purpose. [read post]
19 May 2025, 1:44 am
Canada On 13 May 2025, the Superior Court of Justice – Ontario handed down judgement in the case of Sheridan Retail Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2025, 9:05 pm
In Lucia v. [read post]
18 May 2025, 2:09 pm
Litigation quickly followed, culminating in the Iowa v. [read post]
18 May 2025, 1:07 pm
Hawaii, the Trump policy would likely be struck down as an example of blatant racial discrimination. [read post]
18 May 2025, 12:21 pm
They have to lay down a predicate that the law is confused in order to lead us poor confused people to the promised land. [read post]
18 May 2025, 6:30 am
For example, the 1908 case People’s Pleasure Park Co v. [read post]
17 May 2025, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court in FDA v. [read post]
17 May 2025, 3:13 pm
In Nordine v. [read post]
