Search for: "State v. Holderness" Results 1 - 20 of 8,027
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2022, 9:15 am by Eric Goldman
Copyright holders have long ignored these potential infringements for a range of economic and public relations reasons. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 6:53 pm by Mark Walsh
United States, and the retired justice remains stone-faced with each one. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 6:19 am by Matthew Hersh (Wolters Kluwer)
The court, reversing the injunction and ruling against the trademark holder, found that the RISE label was a weak trademark because it strongly suggested the qualities of the product it labeled and there was extensive third-party usage of the same or similar marks (RiseandShine Corp. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2022, 5:31 am by JP Sarmiento
Since our client resided in Havertown, PA, his application had a better chance compared to states under the 9th Circuit (see Momeni v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 6:15 am by Astrid Reisinger Coracini
The understanding of aggression, the collective act underlying the crime, has remained virtually unchanged in GA Resolution 3314 and Article 8bis(2) of the ICC Statute since it was first introduced by a Soviet diplomat in 1933 and was found to reflect customary law by the International Court of Justice (Nicaragua v. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 4:25 am by Peter J. Sluka
When parties have gone outside the boundaries that the state has set, it makes sense that the state would treat the impermissible act as if it never occurred. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Administrator
” Now leading precedent in Canadian Aboriginal law, the decision produced in Delgamuukw v British Columbia has been cited countless times in both the courts and the legal academy. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 12:00 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Goold argues that such a rule is superior to strict liability because it creates incentives for both the IP holder and the user to avoid infringement [p. 72]. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 3:00 am by Jack Sharman
United States, Case No. 22-cv-81294-AMC (S.D.Fla. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 9:05 pm by John Armour
Changes in the costs of transition or in the mix of shareholders in the firm’s register (green v. non-green) may lead the firm to renege on transition “pledges” when the time comes to incur significant costs. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 1:30 am by Jani Ihalainen
This can happen where the applicant presents itself to the relevant public as the legal or economic successor of the holder of the former mark, when there is no continuity or inheritance relationship. [read post]