Search for: "State v. Leisure" Results 1 - 20 of 321
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2011, 9:35 am by Edward Craven, Matrix.
In the recent case of Parkwood Leisure Ltd v Alemo-Herron & Ors [2011] UKSC 26 the Supreme Court was asked to resolve an important issue concerning the exact scope of that protection. [read post]
24 May 2018, 10:03 am by CMS
However, Taylor Clark’s appeal to the Inner House of the Court of Session was allowed (Clark Leisure Plc v A Decision of the Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) [2016] CSIH 54). [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:33 pm
 Whether it's codeine or Viagra or whatever, the state's entitled to find out what drugs you take at its leisure. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
DDR eventually settled with all defendants except for National Leisure Group, Inc. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:31 pm
It's not quite eleven-a-side, but the much-contested case of Football Association Premier League Ltd, NetMed Hellas SA, Multichoice Hellas SA, Union de Associations de Football, British Sky Broadcasting Limited, Setanta Sports SARL, Group Canal Plus SA and The Motion Picture Association v QC Leisure, David Richardson, AV Station plc, Malcolm Chamberlain, Michael Madden, Sanjay Raval, David Greenslade, SR Leisure Ltd, Philip George Charles Houghton and Derek Owen; The… [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 10:06 pm by Simon Gibbs
The recent case of Ahmed v Aventis Pharma Ltd [2009] EWHC 9052 (Costs) dealt with two small issues but both ones of interest.Firstly, following the decision in Crane v Canons Leisure Ltd [2007 EWCA Civ 1352, where solicitors outsourced the job of sorting and summarising medical records they could treat this work as forming part of their profit costs rather than being treated as a disbursement, and thereby make a profit on this work.The second issue considered whether… [read post]
25 May 2018, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Commissioners for HMRC v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (Scotland) was heard on 11 Apr 2018. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 12:00 am by Laura H. Juillet
The European Court of Justice (the “ECJ”) has handed down its judgment in a key, long-running TUPE case – Alemo-Herron v Parkwood Leisure Ltd. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 7:27 am by Kent Scheidegger
The US Supreme Court will not decide whether retroactive application of the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA) violates the Ex Post Facto Clause in the ungainly-named case of United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 1:05 pm by Liz Kurtz
Has coverage of yesterday's Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
1 Feb 2020, 5:57 am by INFORRM
These conversations tended to be on behalf of clients operating in the leisure and health and fitness industries and related to the appropriateness of the implementation of the technology to facilitate access to their facilities. [read post]