Search for: "State v. Martinez" Results 1 - 20 of 1,274
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Sep 2021, 12:51 pm by Rohini Kurup
In June, the Supreme Court announced that it would hear Federal Bureau of Investigation v. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division, affirming the lower court ruling in each action, said that "When a party moves to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the standard is whether the pleading states a cause of action, not whether the proponent of the pleading has a cause of action," citing Sokol v Leader, 74 AD3d 1180. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division, affirming the lower court ruling in each action, said that "When a party moves to dismiss a complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(7), the standard is whether the pleading states a cause of action, not whether the proponent of the pleading has a cause of action," citing Sokol v Leader, 74 AD3d 1180. [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 3:50 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
And in the article, he states that the aggregate impact of marginal gains can be significant when they are compounded. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 10:52 am by Maurice W. McLaughlin
  Since the Third Circuit hears federal appeals from the Federal District Courts in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware and the United States Virgin Islands, the case, Martinez v. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Robins, which upheld a state law rule that required large shopping malls to allow leafleters and signature gatherers (a rule that has since been applied by some lower courts to outdoor spaces in private universities[113]); Turner Broadcasting System v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 10:18 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
United States, 556 U.S. 129, 137 (2009), by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, see McKeever v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 6:02 pm by Jon Sands
–- The Ninth Circuit affirmed the denial of an Arizona state prisoner’s § 2254 petition, holding that his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel relating to an erroneous jury instruction was not “substantial” under Martinez v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 11:09 am by Unknown
Martinez (Major Crimes Act)Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:08 pm by Francis Pileggi
For the most recent iteration of Delaware law on the topic of forum non conveniens, as it has evolved over the last few years, careful readers should be aware of the recent Chancery decision in Sweeny v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 4:05 am by SHG
This was foreshadowed by District of Colorado Judge William Martinez in Doe v. [read post]
12 May 2021, 8:08 pm by John Elwood
Ramirez, 20-1009Issue: Whether application of the equitable rule the Supreme Court announced in Martinez v. [read post]