Search for: "State v. Nelson" Results 1 - 20 of 1,892
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2025, 7:21 am by Holly
Federal Rule of Evidence 801(d)(1)(A), currently states that a declarant-witness’s prior statement is not hearsay if, among other exceptions, “[t]he declarant testifies and is subject to cross-examination about a prior statement, and the statement[] . [read post]
31 Mar 2025, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
One state court held (by a 5–4 vote) that those statutes themselves violate the First Amendment when applied to newspaper reporters or editors.[7] But in AP v. [read post]
22 Mar 2025, 3:56 pm by jonathanturley
It will join another magazine ban case in Ocean State Tactical v. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court is "not bound to adhere to federal standing requirements" (US Bank N.A. v Nelson, 36 NY3d 998, 1003 n 4 [2020] [Wilson, J., concurring]), under New York law, plaintiffs must nevertheless demonstrate that they suffered an "injury in fact" (Matter of Mental Hygiene Legal Serv. v Daniels, 33 NY3d 44, 50 [2019] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court is "not bound to adhere to federal standing requirements" (US Bank N.A. v Nelson, 36 NY3d 998, 1003 n 4 [2020] [Wilson, J., concurring]), under New York law, plaintiffs must nevertheless demonstrate that they suffered an "injury in fact" (Matter of Mental Hygiene Legal Serv. v Daniels, 33 NY3d 44, 50 [2019] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
5 Mar 2025, 3:30 am by Sasha Volokh
NLRB that a newspaper couldn't fire a reporter for his pro-union activity, but the Washington Supreme Court held in Nelson v. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 10:09 am by Josh Blackman
Nelson in the wake of Windsor, but the precedential value of Baker was always questionable from the outset. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 7:27 am by Will Yeatman
In it, Judge Nelson takes aim at the law of the circuit that would’ve decided CFPB v Cashcall on the merits: [E]ven if CashCall had not waived a jury, it still would not have been entitled to one under our precedent. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
” He did so even though the question of whether the children of people not lawfully in the United States became citizens at birth was resolved more than 100 years ago.In United States v. [read post]
”These words offer a preview of how he can ignore the repeated allegations of unethical behaviors on his own Court.Turning to 2022, the Chief’s Year-End Report recounted shameful efforts by Arkansas Governor Orval Faubus to prevent the integration of the State’s schools after Brown v. [read post]
1 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
Anderson (ruling that states could not determine eligibility for federal office), City of Grants Pass v. [read post]