Search for: "State v. Preston" Results 1 - 20 of 300
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jan 2025, 9:05 pm by Stephen Masterson
Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
In Cadwalladr, the Court of Appeal also confirmed that “publication” for the purposes of section 1(1) (and indeed, the 2013 Act as a whole unless otherwise stated) continued to have its common law meaning – a communication of the statement to someone other than the claimant – and that each single communication is a separate and actionable tort. [read post]
2 Sep 2024, 4:35 am by Donald Dinnie
  If the intention is to exclude a pre-existing condition, that should be expressly and clearly stated. [read post]
Nine years later, the State Board of Equalization (SBE) adopted Regulation 1507, Technology Transfer Agreements, to implement and interpret the TTA statutes and to incorporate the California Supreme Court’s holding in Preston v. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 7:05 am by Unreported Opinions
Andre Preston, Appellant, was charged with: (1) first-degree murder; (2) use of a handgun in the commission of a crime of violence; (3) possession of a regulated […] The post ANDRE PRESTON v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
Hay v Cresswell [2023] EWHC 882 (KB) and Aaronson v Stones [2023] EWHC 2399 (KB) both centred on allegations, published online by the Defendants, that the Claimants had committed acts of sexual violence. [read post]
16 Oct 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
: Making Charter School Boards All-Purpose State Actors Under the Supreme Court’s Amtrak Case, (Drake Law Review, Forthcoming).Neil Siegel, The Wages of Crying Roe: Some Realism About Dobbs v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:13 pm by Joel R. Brandes
 [Canada][Petition granted][ Mature Child Objection Defense][Undue influence]     In Preston v Preston, 2023 WL 300130 (E.D. [read post]
9 May 2023, 1:52 am by David Pocklington
George the Martyr Preston [4], in which Hodge Ch. stated: “[29]. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:30 am by David Pocklington
George the Martyr Preston [2023] ECC Bla 2 Extensive reordering works were proposed. [read post]