Search for: "State v. Public Service Commission"
Results 1 - 20
of 5,264
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Dec 2023, 10:30 pm
The Court has developed a rich case law allowing for a narrow interpretation of its competence’s exclusion concerning restrictive measures (Rosneft; Bank Refah), public procurement and staff management (Elitaliana; H v Council), and international agreements concluded under Article 37 TEU (Mauritius). [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:29 pm
As SCOTUS explains in Plyler v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
In this post, Phil Woodfield and Elizabeth Lombardo of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41, which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 5:01 am
An investigation [by ILG Legal Services] commissioned by DPS was unable to substantiate the allegations of sexual assault raised by Brooks-Fleming and by a third party who had allegedly reported her assault to BLM. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 5:24 am
And I think, you know, the general public have constructed a folk hero, and I’m not going to take that away from them. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:30 pm
Georgia's Public Service Commission consists of five members who are elected through statewide, at-large elections. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:03 am
Federal Election Commission (2003), Grutter v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
Both cases involve what contract support costs the Indian Health Service is obligated to pay to Native American tribesthat manage their own health care programs. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 1:08 pm
” City of Troy v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 10:46 am
Wallace (1939), and United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 12:29 pm
Tunisian public opinion holds the same conviction with an overwhelming 86%. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 6:08 pm
The Court has turned away each such challenge (most recently in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
22 Nov 2023, 6:44 am
A recent Washington Post column stated—misleadingly, if not just plain wrongly—that Google spent billions “to hide this setting from you. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 2:37 am
One critical issue was that under section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998, it is unlawful for a public authority to act in a way that is incompatible with a right under the ECHR – and the Secretary of State is a public authority for that purpose. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 1:07 am
One critical issue was that under section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998, it is unlawful for a public authority to act in a way that is incompatible with a right under the ECHR – and the Secretary of State is a public authority for that purpose. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling in Dobbs v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
During debates, state Democrats argued that the bill is intended to challenge Arizona v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 4:41 pm
Also includes articles on Native American law in the Supreme CourtBoldt Decision — United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 1:28 pm
United States, Thomas v. [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 9:05 pm
The Council also was not persuaded by comments that it was required by the court decision in MetLife[7] to conduct a cost-benefit analysis or an assessment of the likelihood of a company’s material financial distress prior to making a designation.[8]The Interpretive Guidance will become effective 60 days following its publication in the Federal Register and the Analytic Framework will become effective upon its publication. [read post]
