Search for: "State v. Quinn"
Results 1 - 20
of 884
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
As a point of context, it’s worth noting that many states already require disclosure or much more draconian regulation of litigation funders backing state court cases—for instance, some states require funds and funders to register, and some even require funding agreements to be disclosed with the state. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 5:30 am
’ Miller v. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 5:23 pm
Quinn (7th Cir. 2017) (holding that appointed workers' compensation arbitrators can be dismissed as "the face of the administration"); Walsh v. [read post]
19 Dec 2022, 9:51 pm
United States, 91 S. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 6:14 am
Quinn). [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 4:23 am
” Affirming this holding, the Court of Appeals ruled, “We agree that article 9 of the corporation’s by-laws is void as an absolute restraint on the power of alienation violative of the public policy in this State” (Quinn v Stuart Lakes Club, Inc., 57 NY2d 1003 [1982]). [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 1:58 pm
Class V stock was a publicly traded “tracking stock” that tracked the performance of VMware, Inc. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 11:48 am
My writings about the third of the above themes did not take form until ‘Organized Labor, the Supreme Court, and Harris v Quinn: Déjà Vu All Over Again? [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 7:00 am
Quinn, 134 S. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 3:32 am
Matthias Zigann) announced its decision in K.Mizra v. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 1:33 pm
BY JOHN ROEMER *** Just days after the Dobbs v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:00 pm
This will not be IBP v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 7:13 pm
Moreover, petitioner's position that resignation and a promise not to seek future office clears the slate would encourage Judges to disregard the high standards of conduct they are bound to observe and "avoid the consequences of removal for cause by racing to resign"-- a practice rejected by this Court (Matter of Quinn v State Commn. on Judicial Conduct, 54 NY2d 386, 395). [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
V. 2014. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 6:32 am
Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 4:30 am
I was inspired by the Martin-Quinn scores. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 1:41 am
In the Apple v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:15 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on Tuesday announced that it has updated its interim guidance on the Director Review process under Arthrex v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:15 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on Tuesday announced that it has updated its interim guidance on the Director Review process under Arthrex v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:48 am
Prof That same panel is hearing two other IP cases: Samsung v. [read post]
