Search for: "State v. Sherman" Results 1 - 20 of 1,505
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jul 2021, 4:12 am by Michael Douglas
There were three consequences of this removal: first, Fortnite could not be downloaded to an Apple device; secondly, previously installed iOS versions of Fortnite could not be updated; and, thirdly, Apple device users could not play against players who had the latest version of Fortnite.[22] 4         The Proceedings On the same day as Apple removed Fortnite from the App Store, Epic commenced antitrust proceedings in the United States District Court… [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 3:52 pm by Dani Alexis Ryskamp, J.D.
The Ninth Circuit also stated “the record supports the factual findings underlying the injunction and that the district court’s antitrust analysis is faithful to our decision in O’Bannon v. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 7:46 am by Eric Goldman
Terminated Facebook user can’t establish a Sherman Act claim against Facebook. * King v. [read post]
28 Apr 2021, 9:08 pm by Andrew Schaengold
These proposals are in opposition to Senator Murphy’s bill which states that violating NIL legislation is “a per se violation of the Sherman Act. [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 3:14 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
While the complaint sufficiently states a cause of action for fraud, it is time barred. [read post]