Search for: "State v. Bondurant"
Results 1 - 16
of 16
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2019, 1:40 pm
” Daubert v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 5:30 am
Not so fast, the Supreme Court said yesterday in Perdue v. [read post]
1 Sep 2015, 11:44 am
" United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2021, 9:50 am
Edible Arrangements sued Google in Georgia state court for theft of personal property, conversion, money had and received, and civil RICO. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 7:01 am
to see if it could find some soft spot in Georgia state law. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 6:35 am
Fitzgerald of the United States District Court for Central District of California in another case involving against Snapchat related to its Speed Filter – Lemmon v. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 12:45 pm
Bondurant II at lectern for appellees Common Cause in Rucho v. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 7:05 am
Archer, 531 F.3d 1347, 1352 (11th Cir. 2008), and United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2022, 7:34 am
Lemmon v. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 10:02 pm
Hearn cites a 1997 Supreme Court case (Old Chief v. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 9:28 am
The petition for a writ of certiorari, Weis v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 6:22 am
Attorneys eligible are not limited to Plaintiffs’ National Liaison Counsel and members of Plaintiffs’ National Steering Committee, but include, for example, other attorneys called upon by them to assist in performing their responsibilities, State Liaison Counsel, and other attorneys performing similar responsibilities in state court actions in which the presiding state-court judge has imposed similar obligations upon plaintiffs to contribute to the fund.… [read post]
4 Jul 2015, 3:39 pm
” Hall v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
A few months after the Oregon hearings, Judge Weinstein, in the fall of 1996, along with other federal and state judges, held a “Daubert” hearing on the admissibility of expert witness opinion testimony in breast implant cases, pending in New York state and federal courts. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 2:00 pm
Pritchard suggested that corporate shareholders propose a fix for what he considers flaws in the Supreme Court's Basic v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am
In December 1996, Judge Jones issued his decision that excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses’ proposed testimony on grounds that it failed to satisfy the requirements of Rule 702.[5] In October 1996, while Judge Jones was studying the record, and writing his opinion in the Hall case, Judge Weinstein, with a judge from the Southern District of New York, and another from New York state trial court, conducted a two-week Rule 702 hearing, in Brooklyn. [read post]
