Search for: "State v. CERTIFIED SERVICES, INC."
Results 1 - 20
of 1,646
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2010, 3:36 pm
Kelly Services, Inc., 2010 WL 1729174 (N.D. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 5:14 am
In Trust for Certificate Holders of the Merrill Lynch Mortgage Investors Pass-Through Certificates Series 1999-C1, by and through Otix Capital Markets, LLC, as Master Servicer and Special Servicer v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 10:43 am
“We conclude that there is no categorical rule against certifying a Rule 23(b)(3) state-law class action in a proceeding that also [...] [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:08 pm
JKH Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:51 am
Sea-Land Services, Inc. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 10:52 pm
Ramirez v. [read post]
2 Sep 2013, 2:19 pm
In Knight v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 7:04 am
(In re Cyphermint, Inc.) [read post]
22 Jan 2011, 5:34 am
OS Restaurant Services, Inc. [read post]
25 Jul 2021, 7:06 pm
Time Inc., Mattel, Inc. v. 3894207 Canada Inc., and the test for confusion under s. 6 of the Trademarks Act. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 7:35 pm
Amazon.com, Inc. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:57 am
For each episode, a physician must certify both that the patient is eligible to receive services, and that a plan of care for service delivery has been created. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
Patel v. 7-Eleven, Inc., No. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 7:40 am
Patel v. 7-Eleven, Inc., No. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 4:20 pm
The Court has broad discretion in deciding whether to certify a class, Gulf Oil Co. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 8:33 am
In this action for nonpayment of legal fees, defendant GSS Data Services, Inc. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 6:48 pm
Grill Concepts Services, Inc., No. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 12:18 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 2:45 pm
(Angelica Textile Services, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 12:44 pm
Much is being reported in the media about the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California certifying a class of drivers for the Uber ride service who contended that they were employees, not independent contractors. [read post]