Search for: "State v. DeGidio"
Results 1 - 5
of 5
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2009, 7:01 am
In Judge Carr's court, if a plaintiff sues both non-diverse health care providers (on medical malpractice claims) and an out-of-state drug company (on product liability claims), the federal court can sever and remand the med mal claims and retain jurisdiction over the then-diverse products claims.That's the result in DeGidio v. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 3:56 am
If, on the other hand, the disciplinary hearing is not deemed concluded until the hearing officer issued his or her determination and recommendations, this 60-day period would begin to run not before the date the hearing officer issued his or her report -- November 20, 1998.Another case contract time limits: City of Newburgh v DeGidio, 273 A.D.2d 468. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
We discussed Fields v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 12:34 pm
Chalking Is Not a Search Under the Fourth Amendment The Sixth Circuit relied on United States v. [read post]
28 May 2020, 6:13 am
See, for example, DeGidio v. [read post]
