Search for: "State v. Mosher"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Aug 2008, 4:43 pm
Indeed, given the Boisson v. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 4:00 am
[UPDATE : This week the Minnesota Supreme Court denied the petition for review of the Murrin v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 6:00 am
Prior to 1900 New York State civil service appointments from eligible lists were based on the rule of one, also referred to as "the rule of the list. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 6:00 am
Prior to 1900 New York State civil service appointments from eligible lists were based on the rule of one, also referred to as "the rule of the list. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
New York State's Civil Practice Law and Rules [CPLR] sets out the modern equivalents of the surviving ancient writs. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 4:00 am
New York State's Civil Practice Law and Rules [CPLR] sets out the modern equivalents of the surviving ancient writs. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:50 am
” Mosher-Simons v County of Allegany, 99 NY2d 214, 219 (2002), quoting Tarfer v State oflVew York, 68 NY2d 511, 518 (1986). [read post]
2 Aug 2018, 4:18 am
See Mosher-Simons v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 4:25 am
Court rules that the appointing authority made its appointments consistent with the requirements of Section 61.1 of the Civil Service Law Cherry v New York State Civ. [read post]
2 May 2017, 11:42 am
In Birchfield v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 10:59 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 17, 2009 Mosher v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 10:47 am
. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 17, 2009 Mosher v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 4:15 am
Applying the rule of three in selecting candidates on an eligible list for appointmentHatala v McCaul, App. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 11:15 am
Court rules that the appointing authority made its appointments consistent with the requirements of Section 61.1 of the Civil Service LawMatter of Cherry v New York State Civ. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
”Following the Mosher decision, then Section 14 of the Civil Service Law was further amended to provided that “appointments shall be made from among those graded highest,” thus restoring the language initially set out in the Civil Service Law of 1883. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
”Following the Mosher decision, then Section 14 of the Civil Service Law was further amended to provided that “appointments shall be made from among those graded highest,” thus restoring the language initially set out in the Civil Service Law of 1883. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 8:55 am
Grievant admitted he had made the comment but stated he hadn't meant anything by it. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 12:33 pm
Certified Driving History Not Enough for Operating After SuspensionState of Maine v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Although in People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that a civil service commission cannot mandate a rule of one with respect to appointing an individual from an examination eligible list to a position in the competitive class, the appointing authority itself may elect to be bound by such a rule. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Although in People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that a civil service commission cannot mandate a rule of one with respect to appointing an individual from an examination eligible list to a position in the competitive class, the appointing authority itself may elect to be bound by such a rule. [read post]
