Search for: "Tiffany v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Sep 2010, 11:35 am
On August 27, 2010, Tiffany (NJ) Inc., and Tiffany & Co. filed a Petition for a Writ of Certiorari appealing the ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
3 May 2010, 10:16 am
Tiffany & Co. v. eBay Inc., No. 08- 3947 (2d Cir. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 2:11 pm
The post United States Supreme Court Dismisses Mississippi v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day is Tiffany (NJ) LLC v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day is Tiffany (NJ) LLC v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
The case of the day is Tiffany (NJ) LLC v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 7:15 am
On August 17, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit vacated and remanded a decision of the district court in Tiffany & Co. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day is Tiffany (NJ) LLC v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 11:09 am
On September 9, 2015, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York ruled that Costco was willfully infringing Tiffany & Co. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Li (S.D.N.Y. 2011), reprises the issues confronted in Tiffany (NJ) LLC v. [read post]
24 Nov 2017, 4:39 am
In an analysis for The New York Times, Eduardo Porter discusses Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 2:13 pm
Judge Gregory of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit ruled in favor of Tiffany Mosby-Grant, a female police recruit, against the city of Hagerstown, Maryland and its police department in a sexual harassment case, reversing the district court’s summary judgment ruling. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 8:47 am
Stanford student Tiffany Cartwright summarizes Tuesday’s oral argument in Forest Grove v. [read post]
8 May 2009, 8:10 am
By Tiffanie C. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 2:03 pm
Martinez before the fictitious Thirteenth Circuit, in an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Tennessee. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:15 am
See United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 8:45 am
Tiffany & Co., 166 F.3d 422, 425 (2d Cir. 1999)). [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:00 pm
YSL's attorneys therefore maintained that Louboutin is not entitled to a trademark for the red soles, citing the United States Supreme Court's 1995 decision in Qualitex v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 9:26 pm
See, Arizona v. [read post]
18 May 2018, 4:00 am
United States, in which the court held that a driver can object under the Fourth Amendment to a search of a rental car even when he is not listed on the rental agreement, “suggests a wholesale rewrite of the Supreme Court’s decisions governing when police are allowed to intrude on a suspect’s privacy” and “could throw federal law enforcement into chaos. [read post]
