Search for: "Toy v. Toy" Results 1 - 20 of 1,668
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2010, 7:19 pm by Ray Dowd
  A divided Ninth Circut confirmed a finding of copyrightability over a spirited dissent in  Lanard Toys Ltd v Novelty Inc, 2010 WL 1452527 (April 13, 2010).At issue was Chinese knockoffs of popular American toys. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 5:30 am
  It would provide hours of fun trying to predict what the Supreme Court would do with any given religious display, and students could use it to review their understanding of Lynch v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 2:50 am
CAAF decided United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 7:04 pm
The Fourth District Court of Appeal ruled today in Ingram v. [read post]
25 Dec 2015, 3:39 am
Here is the list:i) Tickle Me Elmo; (ii) Beanie Babies; (iii) Silly Bandz; (iv) Pet Rocks; (v) Tamagotchi; (vi) Cabbage Patch Kids; (vii) OGs; (viii) Furby; ix) Bratz Dolls; and (x) the Rubik's Cube An impressive list of improbably commercially successful toys, but in this Kat's eyes, one of them stands out: the success of the Pet Rock in the mid-1970’s. [read post]