Search for: "True v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 9,287
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2025, 5:01 am
United States, the Supreme Court upheld the denial of a tax exemption to a university that banned interracial dating by its students, and that threatened to expel students who violated the ban.[7] Likewise, in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 5:50 am
A simple search confirms that this phrase is never used—not once—in either Elk or United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2025, 11:51 am
The 14th Amendment to the Constitution provides that “[a]ll persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. [read post]
17 Apr 2025, 9:00 am
ME); State of Colorado v HHS (D.R.I.); Widakuswara v. [read post]
16 Apr 2025, 4:11 pm
And, as just established, this is especially true with respect to schemes of taxation, which has led a number of United States Supreme Court justices to note ruefully that “ ‘Logic and taxation are not always the best of friends. [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 3:46 pm
In U.S. courts, United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 7:42 am
In Dewberry Group, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 4:00 am
United States] sees its role primarily as one of setting a precedent for all potential future Presidents. [read post]
13 Apr 2025, 5:39 am
Rodriguez v. [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 12:35 pm
The case is styled United States of America v. [read post]
10 Apr 2025, 7:11 am
United States, which would allow the president to do just that. [read post]
9 Apr 2025, 1:56 pm
The new rule exempts all domestic entities and U.S. person beneficial owners from BOI reporting obligations, and redefines “reporting company” to include only foreign entities registered to do business in the United States. [read post]
9 Apr 2025, 4:19 am
What happens after the Court refuses to twist the Constitution to suit President Trump’s desires, it will not be because the Supreme Court of the United States has failed us. [read post]
8 Apr 2025, 6:00 am
State v. [read post]
7 Apr 2025, 6:04 pm
United States, 323 U. [read post]
7 Apr 2025, 3:35 am
The statement is a true delight for anyone who considers themselves a “securities law nerd” – because it explains how the Staff applies the seminal cases of Reves v. [read post]
6 Apr 2025, 5:01 am
The letter responded to the university's attempt to talk by outlining some, but possibly not all, of the changes the university would have to make in order to preserve the university's "continued financial relationship with the United States government. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 4:11 pm
Instead, the Tucker Act grants the Court of Federal Claims jurisdiction over suits based on "any express or implied contract with the United States. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 7:00 am
Consent in Dred Scott Written by a slaveholder and joined by five other slaveholders, Dred Scott v. [read post]
3 Apr 2025, 7:40 am
" United States v. [read post]
