Search for: "United States v. Classic"
Results 1 - 20
of 1,708
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Sep 2023, 4:56 am
As enacted, the statute of limitations was tied together with the Tucker Act’s waiver, so no court had occasion to apply it except in suits under the Tucker Act, a classic suit against the United States. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 7:20 am
Robinson, Co-Editor-in-Chief, Workers’ Compensation Emerging Issues Analysis (LexisNexis) As we move through the third decade of the twenty-first century, the United States remains a land of contradictions. [read post]
21 Sep 2023, 6:05 am
United States, and United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 10:53 am
According to Allen, Toyota USA “sells Toyota Parts in the United States at prices substantially higher than those charged by Toyota in other places. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:18 am
China Southern Airlines] shows stylistic and reasoning flaws that do not generally appear in decisions issued by United States Courts of Appeals. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 6:05 am
Both Germany and the United States have advocated the “hybrid” route, with U.S. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 5:55 am
It is time for the United States and other world powers to act. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 5:38 am
Although ICJ decisions lack formal precedential effect, I agree with Jamshidi that the ICJ’s decision in Jurisdictional Immunities of the State (Germany v. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 3:40 am
This just in: Journal of Law and Public Policy Fall 2023 Symposium Topic: Free Speech and the United States Constitution Date: November 17, 2023 (speakers are welcome to participate in-person or by Zoom) University of St. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 9:12 pm
In Brown Shoe v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 7:46 pm
The key issue was whether the DOJ had done enough to show one or more of these geographic markets: the entire United States; the three-state area of Wisconsin, Illinois, and Michigan; or just Wisconsin. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 11:24 am
Classic, 313 U.S. 299 (1941); • destroy ballots, United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 1:10 pm
For example, in the classic 1922 case of Pennsylvania Coal v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:59 pm
The United States proposed a broad product market including all shoes. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:54 am
Audemars Piquet Holding S.A. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 9:38 am
See United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 3:43 am
The second is that Judge Terry Doughty’s injunction in Missouri v. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:15 am
And in the United States, the statistics are that Apple has well over half of the smartphones. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 11:46 pm
It will then treat the two (or more) people as a unit and treat the unit differently from how it would treat those same people individually. [read post]
