Search for: "United States v. Lowe's Inc" Results 1 - 20 of 1,146
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2025, 7:16 pm by Robert Kuhn
  In this way, the statute is written to “penalize[] agents of a condemnor for deliberately low offers because a low offer may result in the condemnor paying the owner’s litigation expenses as well as its own. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 10:25 am by Guest Author
But it would not obviously mean, for example, that the United States could not sue Cause Based Commerce to collect its fair share of the USF support costs. [read post]
16 Mar 2025, 9:05 pm by renholding
Companies with low profits and shareholder returns may find themselves the targets of hedge fund activists or private equity hunters. [read post]
4 Mar 2025, 8:16 am by Above the Law
 First, from Bloomberg Law: “A Manhattan federal judge recused himself from a case involving PayPal Inc. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 12:36 pm by Guest Author
”  Perhaps the most comprehensive articulation to date of how this crackdown might play out can be found in then-FTC Commissioner Andrew Ferguson’s concurrence in the case of FTC v. 1661, Inc. d/b/a GOAT (December 2, 2024). [read post]
3 Feb 2025, 9:01 pm by renholding
In the face of continuing uncertainties in the United States and abroad, we expect the provisions of transaction agreements that allocate regulatory risk to remain an area of focus. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 4:54 am by Charles Sartain
Says the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, No. [read post]
23 Jan 2025, 5:03 am by Kristian Stout
As the DOJ’s complaint quotes an email from a property owner: I also rely on comparing available units to adj[usted] leases needed, to forecast leases, to gut check the pricing recs. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 6:48 am by David Bernstein
It is the policy of the United States to protect the civil rights of all Americans and to promote individual initiative, excellence, and hard work. [read post]
22 Jan 2025, 2:59 am by jonathanturley
The order makes direct reference to the decision of the United States Supreme Court in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]