Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 1 - 20 of 10,262
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 May 2024, 6:55 am by Dennis Crouch
It also provides representative examples of the mark as displayed on products in stores in the United States. [read post]
1 May 2024, 11:04 am by Barbara Moreno
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES 43. [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:53 am by JURIST Staff
In 1990, Asma Jahangir successfully represented Darshan Masih in a landmark case regarding bonded labor (Darshan Masih v the State, PLD 1990 SC 513). [read post]
30 Apr 2024, 10:28 am by admin
In any event, Egilman was probably not committed to the violent overthrow of the United States government because he had found a better way to destabilize our society by allying himself with the lawsuit industry. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:02 pm by Dennis Crouch
Cir. 1973) (holding that Section 6(g) “empowered [the FTC] to promulgate substantive rules of business conduct”); United States v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by Austin Sarat
” Conservatives, Time notes, once looked to universities to “reproduce the middle and upper echelons of Christian society in the United States—something classical liberals from Thomas Jefferson to today’s postliberal academics on the right … have historically appreciated and felt worth conserving. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 5:00 am by Sarah Friedman
On May 17, 1954, the United States Supreme Court handed down its decision in Brown v. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 11:27 am by admin
First, paraquat is closely regulated for agricultural use in the United States. [read post]
24 Apr 2024, 5:57 am by Norman L. Eisen
The United States, like many other functioning democracies, is hardly immune from backsliding and lurching toward autocracy. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:27 am by CFM Admin
The court granted the SEC’s summary judgment motion in part, holding that the defendants had offered and sold unregistered securities since it found that TerraUSD, LUNA and MIR tokens were investment contracts under United States v. [read post]