Search for: "United States v. Morales"
Results 1 - 20
of 3,110
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Feb 2025, 9:01 pm
As the article more thoroughly explains, based on specific statutory authority in Delaware’s General Corporation Law, longstanding foundational principles of Delaware corporate law, and an overlooked aspect of the seminal duty of oversight case Marchand v. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 12:33 am
” The ECtHR stated that Article 8 did not apply, as “the underlying reasons for the applicant’s dismissal from work were sufficiently linked to his private life. [read post]
15 Feb 2025, 4:51 pm
Consider the case of United State v. [read post]
14 Feb 2025, 6:30 am
That characterization has been generally accurate in United States, but is not inevitable. [read post]
Blog Post: Groups Sue Trump Administration for Access to Immigrants Sent from U.S. to Guantánamo Bay
12 Feb 2025, 11:57 am
” “Secretly transferring people from the United States to Guantánamo without access to legal representation or the outside world is not only illegal, it is a moral crisis for this nation,” said Deepa Alagesan, senior supervising attorney at the International Refugee Assistance Project (IRAP) . [read post]
12 Feb 2025, 8:44 am
United States | Oyez Miranda v. [read post]
11 Feb 2025, 6:30 am
Jonathan Chausovsky The vast uprising of critiques of the current effort to dismantle the institutions of the United States Government is pervasive and important. [read post]
10 Feb 2025, 6:44 pm
Senator Mitch McConnell, for example, said on the floor of the Senate that “There’s no question, none, that President Trump is practically and morally responsible for provoking the events of the day [i.e., January 6],” but that as a matter of process President Trump was not subject to impeachment, because he was no longer in office. [read post]
7 Feb 2025, 5:00 am
The issue before the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit was the use of a police psychiatrist to examine Brown, who had a 51 IQ. [read post]
6 Feb 2025, 6:00 am
Sending anyone from the United States to Guantanamo raises a host of legal, moral, and policy questions. [read post]
3 Feb 2025, 5:01 am
United States (1951)). [read post]
2 Feb 2025, 4:23 pm
It may be subject to editorial revision.In the case of Locascia and Others v. [read post]
31 Jan 2025, 12:29 pm
Legally, opponents of the administration’s stance sometimes cite the 2020 Supreme Court decision Bostock v. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
In support of its argument that NJT was an "arm of the state" entitled to invoke sovereign immunity, defendants cited a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit holding that NJT is entitled to invoke sovereign immunity in federal court (see Karns v Shanahan, 879 F3d 504, 519 [3d Cir 2018]). [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am
In support of its argument that NJT was an "arm of the state" entitled to invoke sovereign immunity, defendants cited a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit holding that NJT is entitled to invoke sovereign immunity in federal court (see Karns v Shanahan, 879 F3d 504, 519 [3d Cir 2018]). [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 2:23 pm
(Declaring a National Emergency at the Southern Border of the United States)Mr. [read post]
21 Jan 2025, 4:15 am
Invalidating the true and biological category of “woman” improperly transforms laws and policies designed to protect sex-based opportunities into laws and policies that undermine them, replacing longstanding, cherished legal rights and values with an identity-based, inchoate social concept....It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female. [read post]
6 Jan 2025, 11:00 am
Laura Coordes, Harrington v. [read post]
1 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
United States decision. [read post]
1 Jan 2025, 2:24 pm
In most states, the priestly role has been transformed. [read post]