Search for: "United States v. National Lead Co" Results 1 - 20 of 1,139
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2020, 4:09 pm by fvanloon
The stated purpose of the FBI portion of the briefing was to provide the recipients “a baseline on the presence and threat posed by foreign intelligence services to the National Security of the U.S. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 9:01 am by Robert Liles
  The proceeds of the fraudulent scheme were allegedly laundered through international shell corporations and used to purchase exotic automobiles, yachts and luxury real estate in the United States and abroad. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:43 pm
It is impossible not to note that leverage is an easy concept to sling around where it is a Dutch company and a Dutch governmental unit projecting international standards downward into Bangladesh. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 5:34 pm by David Kopel
In other words, "the sorts of weapons protected were those 'in common use at the time.'" Id. at 627 (quoting United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 5:00 am by Jason Rantanen
  Unlike the state law situation – where state law is subordinate to federal law – the Federal Circuit will be applying the law of the United States to acts in a co-equal sovereign. [read post]
3 Feb 2020, 12:42 pm by Elliot Setzer, William Ford
Learning will fall into three main categories: Writing: Work with Associate Editors to monitor national security and foreign policy developments, and 4-5 times per week, co-write “Today’s Headlines and Commentary”; work with Associate Editors to co-write “The Week that Will Be,” a weekly feature that outlines upcoming events, academic announcements, and employment announcements; work with the Associate Editor to co-write a deep-dive… [read post]
2 Feb 2020, 1:19 pm by Ilya Somin
Unlike the countries included in earlier travel bans, nationals of  countries newly added to list are not subjected to a near-total ban on entry into the United States. [read post]
31 Jan 2020, 2:22 pm by fvanloon
Department of State (No. 1:20-cv-000229)) and (Judicial Watch v. [read post]
21 Jan 2020, 9:17 am by Hannah Kris
Learning will fall into three main categories: Writing: Work with Associate Editors to monitor national security and foreign policy developments, and 4-5 times per week, co-write “Today’s Headlines and Commentary”; work with Associate Editors to co-write “The Week that Will Be,” a weekly feature that outlines upcoming events, academic announcements, and employment announcements; work with the Associate Editor to co-write a deep-dive… [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:36 am by Guest
Moreover, it is a cardinal rule of interpretation that a statute must be read literally but “if such a reading leads to absurdity and the words are susceptible of another meaning, the Court may adopt the same. [read post]
13 Jan 2020, 11:57 am by Hannah Kris, William Ford
The committee has invited Secretary of State Mike Pompeo to testify, and will hear testimony from Richard Haass, the former State Department director of policy planning; Avril Haines, the former deputy national security advisor; and Stephen Hadley, the former national security advisor. [read post]
As former Justice Benjamin Curtis, who dissented in Dred Scott v. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 1:43 pm by Hannah Kris
Thursday, Jan. 9, 2:00 p.m.: The Atlantic Council will be hosting a conversation on the United States’ relations with Iraq and Iran following recent developments in the region. [read post]
29 Dec 2019, 7:23 pm
  This was also the year of the rise of the core of leadership--in Turkey, Russia, China, the United States, Germany, and France. [read post]
26 Dec 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Senator Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), who is a co-sponsor of the bill. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 11:59 am by Guest
Cardozo’s line from from Schechter Poultry was “re-tweeted” as recently as 1995, in United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 11:59 pm by Roel van Woudenberg
It has also been argued that the matter of double patenting by two EP patents is not an EPO matter, but a matter of national law - as it is of double patenting between an EP patent and a national patent or national utility model (Art. 139(3) EPC).In oral proceedings in early February this year, the Board decided to refer questions to the Enlarged Board to clarify the matter. [read post]