Search for: "United States v. Peterson"
Results 1 - 20
of 314
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am
To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
This is elaborated a little more in the abstract: Pix credit hereABSTRACT: When the leaders of the United States and of the Peoples Republic of China refer to human rights, they invoke entirely different conceptions. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:26 pm
(Navajo and Hopi Indian Land Settlement Act of 1974)United States v. [read post]
22 Nov 2022, 5:19 am
Here are the materials so far in United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:55 am
Cockrum v. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:53 am
Peterson, Daggers & Fighting Knives of the Western World 60 (1968). [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 5:00 am
Key Takeaways Browning v. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 7:59 am
See United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 3:35 pm
., United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
The lawsuit charges he “is wrongfully retaining Presidential records that are the property of the United States, and which constitute part of the permanent historical record of the prior administration. [read post]
3 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
" United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 3:54 am
Notably, the Davis v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 5:13 am
From Judge James Peterson's decision Friday in Ervins v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:03 am
Contractors Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 8:55 am
Thus the operationally crucial question is whether proposals like mine would confront any insuperable obstacles under United States law. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am
(The matter is uncertain in some circuits, see, e.g., Peterson v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 8:47 am
Instead, they were protesting judicial decisions that ordered the assets paid to judgment creditors in terrorism cases, in particular the Supreme Court’s decision in Peterson v. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 5:53 pm
Branen, 17 F.3d 552, 557 (2d Cir. 1994) (stating broadly that “[i]t is widely recognized that all law enforcement officials have an affirmative duty to intervene to protect the constitutional rights of citizens from infringement by other law enforcement officers in their presence,” including when “any constitutional violation has been committed by a law enforcement official”); Peterson v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 11:11 am
United States. [read post]
