Search for: "United States v. Ramsey"
Results 1 - 20
of 174
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jul 2024, 2:55 pm
United States goes too far in granting such immunity to the president, though the exact scope of what they have given him is often vague. [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) applied this provision when it refused Steve Elster’s application to register the phrase “Trump Too Small” as a trademark for shirts. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 1:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:05 pm
See, e.g., McCulloch v. [read post]
23 Feb 2024, 1:43 pm
Things can be source identifiers, without being commercial source identifiers (United We Stand): confusion but not dilution actionable Jack Daniel’s didn’t purport to decide the full scope of the “noncommercial” exclusion. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 10:42 am
Hines, another American Giants alum who pitched for 8 years or so for the Ramsey (Unit) Hard Hitters. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 9:30 pm
Mark Graber disputes the significance of the latest discovery of Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman related to whether the President is an Office of the United States for purposes of Section 3 of the fourteenth Amendment (Balkinization).ICYMI: The failed attempt to rename Brown v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 1:51 pm
API v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 8:07 am
Vidal v. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
VIP Products LLC (covered in this excellent post by Lisa Ramsey). [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 6:38 am
Ramsey [Lisa P. [read post]
11 Jun 2023, 6:09 pm
Tam and Iancu v. [read post]
4 Mar 2023, 4:38 am
It is extremely difficult to square the state bar’s version with what the prosecutor said, as recounted in Miller v Pate. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 9:05 pm
Okla. 1984). 6 See United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 8:19 am
Supreme Court in June 1992 established the “Daubert Rule” in its landmark decision Daubert v. [read post]
7 Dec 2022, 2:26 pm
(Navajo and Hopi Indian Land Settlement Act of 1974)United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 9:10 am
For example, a clear statement is needed before a statute is read to interfere with a state's internal governance (Gregory v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 1:39 pm
United States, 281 F.3d 1234, 1239–40 (Fed. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am
Introduction: Robert Burrell Australia/NZ is probably unusual b/c abandonment plays 3 distinct roles: (1) not a purely rhetorical device. 1863 case: from the moment you first use a TM, you have a property right—no goodwill, no reputation required. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 11:43 am
This test was first articulated by the United States Supreme Court in Illinois v. [read post]
