Search for: "United Air Lines v. Public Utilities Commission of Cal."
Results 1 - 19
of 19
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2024, 10:12 am
After an extensive public review process, involving multiple hearings before the City’s Planning Commission, Design Review Commission, and City Council, the project was reduced to 12 units and ultimately approved by the Council, subject to conditions of approval, as CEQA-exempt pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines’ categorical exemption for infill development. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 11:26 am
In July 2024, the Center for Art Law met with the Korea Copyright Commission to discuss copyright protection for choreographers in the United States and the challenges related to enforcement. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Tuolumne Jobs & Small Business Alliance v The Superior Court (2014) 59 Cal.4th 1029. [read post]
1 Dec 2017, 12:44 pm
Exposition Metro Line Construction Authority (2013) 57 Cal.4th 439 (my post on which can be found here). [read post]
18 Nov 2024, 10:43 am
[¶] (e) The site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
That alternative is backed by a diverse group that includes The Bay Institute, the Contra Costa Council, Defenders of Wildlife, Environmental Entrepreneurs, the Planning and Conservation League, the Natural Resources Defense Council, the San Diego County Water Authority, Alameda County Water District, Contra Costa Water District, East Bay Municipal Utility District, Otay Water District, the City of San Diego and the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission.… [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 8:53 am
City of West Hollywood (2008) 45 Cal.4th 116. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm
Cal.). [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
For a project to qualify for an infill exemption, five criteria must be met: (1) the project must be consistent with the applicable general plan and zoning, (2) development must occur within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, (3) the site must not be habitat for endangered, rare, or threatened species, (4) project approval must not result in significant effects to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and (5) the site… [read post]
31 Mar 2017, 3:37 pm
Numerous public comments mentioned the need to identify ESHA in the EIR. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:41 pm
C084872) ____ Cal. [read post]
11 Jul 2018, 9:28 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
Sierra Club v. [read post]
3 Jun 2021, 3:00 am
Cal. [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:00 am
.; CEQA Guidelines, Cal. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 5:39 pm
Solano County Airport Land Use Commission (2007) 41 Cal.4th 372, 382. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 11:57 pm
California Coastal Comm. (1982) 33 Cal.3d 158. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm
Food and Drug Administration, the Consumer Product Safety Commission and the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. [read post]
