Search for: "United States v. Armstrong"
Results 1 - 20
of 319
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Aug 2019, 8:03 am
United States, decided June 19, 2019, the U.S. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:40 am
Armstrong v. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 5:56 pm
United States Anti-Doping Agency, No. 12-0606 (W.D. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 2:44 am
Soon after, the USADA announced that three members of Armstrong’s team have all received lifetime periods of ineligibility as the result of their anti-doping rule violations in the United States Postal Service (USPS) Cycling Team Doping Conspiracy. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 5:47 am
The USADA then announced that three members of Armstrong’s team received lifetime periods of ineligibility as the result of their anti-doping rule violations in the United States Postal Service (USPS) Cycling Team Doping Conspiracy. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
Armstrong v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 3:42 am
Armstrong v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 12:29 pm
Landis v. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 12:09 pm
Back in 1995, the United States Postal Service (USPS) sponsored the cycling team headed by Lance Armstrong, its top rider. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 4:00 pm
Back in 1995, the United States Postal Service (USPS) sponsored the cycling team headed by Lance Armstrong, its top rider. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 12:09 pm
Back in 1995 the United States Postal Service (USPS) sponsored the cycling team headed by Lance Armstrong, its top rider. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 4:00 pm
Back in 1995, the United States Postal Service (USPS) sponsored the cycling team headed by Lance Armstrong, its top rider. [read post]
29 Aug 2012, 9:33 pm
by Jeremy Clare Even though Lance Armstrong decided on August 23rd not to proceed to arbitration with the United States Anti-Doping Agency (“USADA”), the process for sanctioning Mr. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 5:35 pm
The Court noted, “Contrary to Armstrong’s apparent belief, pleadings filed in the United States District Courts are not press releases, internet blogs, or pieces of investigative journalism. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:28 pm
Armstrong v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 5:49 am
United States Anti-Doping Agency, Protocol for Olympic and Paralympic Movement Testing § 13 (2009) [hereinafter USADA Protocol]. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 8:55 am
In related news, Armstrong’s former team director, Johan Bruyneel, and two former United States Postal Service cycling team doctors, Pedro Celaya and Jose Marti, will apparently face arbitration before the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) in December. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 7:11 am
On March 31, 2015, the United States Supreme Court decided Armstrong v. [read post]
24 Aug 2012, 3:20 pm
Related Posts: Armstrong v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 3:53 pm
by Renée Kolar On July 20, the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) filed its Motion to Dismiss Lance Armstrong’s Amended Complaint. [read post]
