Search for: "United States v. Dwyer" Results 1 - 20 of 60
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
Chertoff, 497 F.3d 379 (4th Cir. 2007) and United States v.... [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 4:31 am
Article 8 (family life): Reliance was placed by Counsel for Mr O'Dwyer on observations on Article 8 in Bermingham & others v USA [2006] EWHC 200 (Admin) where Laws LJ stated (at [121]) that:'I do not accept (the US) submission that the possibility of trial in the United Kingdom is legally irrelevant. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 8:32 am by Isabel McArdle
The Government of the United States of America -v- O’Dwyer, Westminster Magistrates’ Court – Read judgment It seems appropriate, on the day when Wikipedia shut down for 24 hours to protest against US anti-piracy legislation, to talk about piracy (in the copyright sense) and what role human rights law has to play in the perpetual battle against it. [read post]
23 Jul 2015, 6:32 am by SHG
United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. [read post]
15 May 2010, 3:23 am by SHG
True, an objectively reasonable traffic stop is not invalidated because the primary motivation of the police was to investigate some other matter (see Whren v United States, 517 US 806 [1996]; People v. [read post]
7 Sep 2018, 10:12 am by Hannah Catt
He used a case study from one of his successful cases, Oklahoma Genetics Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 1:13 pm by admin
United States and Black v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:34 am by Susan Brenner
Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit 2001) (Defendant stated in an internet chatroom `I will kill'), United States v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:54 am by Amanda Rice
United States and heard oral argument in Bullcoming v. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 3:30 am by Mark Summerfield
  (Decision: The Government of the United States of America v Richard O’Dwyer – PDF). [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 4:31 am by SHG
The case helped bring an end to the death penalty in New York and was cited by the United States Supreme Court in the 1966 Miranda v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 7:56 am by Susan Brenner
” Specifically, the statute provides as follows: Whoever travels in or causes another . . . to travel in interstate or foreign commerce, or uses or causes another . . . to use the mail or any facility of interstate or foreign commerce, with intent that a murder be committed in violation of the laws of any State or the United States as consideration for the receipt of, or as consideration for a promise or agreement to pay, anything of pecuniary value . . . shall be… [read post]