Search for: "United States v. Garcia"
Results 1 - 20
of 800
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2018, 9:14 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 1:40 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:02 am
We note, for example, that after we first issued our opinion, the United States Copyright Office sent Garcia a letter denying her request to register a copyright in her performance. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 3:56 pm
The very odd case of Garcia v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:12 am
(United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 8:12 am
(United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 12:17 pm
Santos Garcia v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:59 am
For a United States court to do so was anathema to the principles underlying the First Amendment. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 10:16 am
SCOTUSblog deserves considerable thanks for putting together this symposium about United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 3:47 pm
In United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 5:16 am
Soto v Garcia, 2022 WL 780701 (N.D. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 8:01 am
See United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 12:16 pm
Here's a snippet:"In United States v. [read post]
22 May 2015, 2:13 pm
Related Issues: Fair Use and Intellectual Property: Defending the BalanceRelated Cases: Garcia v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 3:15 pm
United States v. [read post]
21 Dec 2008, 10:23 am
For example, the decision states that a district court does not have the power to suspend a sentence, citing United States v. [read post]
14 Apr 2025, 10:17 am
Abrego Garcia — obligated the Trump administration to "facilitate and effectuate" returning Abrego Garcia to the United States and sent the case back to the district court to "clarify" the meaning of "effectuate" and to do so with "the deference owed to the Executive Branch in the conduct of foreign affairs. [read post]
5 Jun 2010, 8:42 am
You may recall the denial of extraordinary relief and a writ appeal three years ago in the similar case of United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 11:55 am
See People v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 2:48 pm
United States v. [read post]
