Search for: "United States v. MacDonald" Results 1 - 20 of 126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 May 2010, 12:39 pm by jamison
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit today denied the government’s motion to dismiss the defendant’s appeal in the case of United States v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 3:23 am by jamison
Multiple prosecutors, both federal and state, called Michael Malone to the stand to testify for the government in numerous cases when they either knew or should have known that the testimony he was about to deliver was false. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 9:01 pm by Rodger Citron
  Ultimately, however, the United States Department of Justice indicted MacDonald, and a jury convicted him after a trial in 1979. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:17 pm by Dwight Sullivan
United States, No. 10-710, has been distributed for Friday’s conference. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 7:49 am
Better yet, perhaps the MacDonald medical malpractice appeal will be taken to the United States Supreme Court! [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 10:09 am
NIMJ's web site has posted a fascinating ruling by Vice Admiral MacDonald granting a petition for new trial in United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 6:45 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
 2019), the judgment of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 8:32 am by Mark Sorkin
Wilson, citing at length their contention that the record-high level of incarceration in the United States has been beneficial. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:18 am by MOTP
Jurisdiction CRS is a Florida company whose principal office is in that state, and MacDonald is a Texas company whose principal office is in this state. [read post]
11 Aug 2006, 6:53 am
MacDonald Watson Waste Oil Co., 933 F.2d 35 (1st Cir. 1991) and United States v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 7:30 am
President Clinton on numerous occasions averred that the United States was not at war. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 7:38 am
MacDonald), 162 N.H. at 66, 27 A.3d 813.The defendant argues that `[t]here is a long line of cases’ beginning with State v. [read post]