Search for: "United States v. Parr"
Results 1 - 20
of 47
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Oct 2009, 5:30 am
In this case, a Canadian law firm's sole contact with the United States was the filing of a patent application. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 12:10 pm
"Hot Coffee" is a 2011 documentary film by attorney Susan Saladoff taking a closer look at the truths, realities and misperceptions of tort reform throughout the United States, including the case Liebeck v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 11:00 am
Cir. 2012); State Indus. v. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 2:15 pm
The statute states in relevant part: (a) Offense against a national of the United States or within the United States. [read post]
29 May 2015, 5:57 am
As this news story notes, both the federal government and the State of Indiana have charged Bradbury for the comments in his Facebook post. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
” Waltersheid, The Early Evolution of the United States Patent Law: Antecedents (Part 3), 77 J. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 3:26 am
Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Cruikshank, R. v [2012] EWCA Crim 1519 (03 July 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Activa DPS Europe SARL v Pressure Seal Solutions Ltd (t/a Welltec Systems UK) [2012] EWCA Civ 943 (11 July 2012) Leach v The Office of Communications (OFCOM) [2012] EWCA Civ 959 (13 July 2012) SG (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 940 (13 July 2012) Berent v Family Mosaic Housing & Anor… [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 6:56 am
Bereskin & Parr, 299 Fed. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 9:39 am
One exception to the Act’s grant of immunity is where the case is “based upon a commercial activity carried on in the United States by [a] foreign state. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
NARA v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 11:54 am
In United States v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 11:41 am
The United States Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently affirmed a lower court’s decision against an Indiana man who lost his foot in a crane accident. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:43 pm
FTC More recently, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:43 pm
FTC More recently, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 7:34 am
In Muscarello v. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 6:47 am
In Touchcom, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 1:13 pm
Question No. 5 Real Case: YES Citation: United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v . [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 9:24 am
.* Monarchy in the United States: validity is king, for patents at any rateThis is the first post from Jeremy on IPBC Global 2015 Intellectual Property Business Conference of San Francisco. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 11:48 pm
FTC More recently, the United States Supreme Court decided a case called North Carolina State Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 1:49 am
In this guest post, long-time Katfriend Dan Bereskin (Bereskin & Parr LLP) gently chides the United States for its regular criticism of its northern neighbour for failure to take sufficient steps to deal with piracy and counterfeiting. [read post]
