Search for: "United States v. Provident National Bank" Results 1 - 20 of 1,739
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2007, 7:50 am
What, you might ask, could possibly be the connection between the Bank(s) of the United States and Blackwater, the apparently lawless security force operating in Iraq? [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 3:56 pm
Answer:          Yes, According to the United States Supreme Court in Watters, Commissioner v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 10:36 am by Adam Levitin
In codifying that third preemption route, Congress provided that it was "in accordance with the legal standard for preemption in the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Barnett Bank of Marion County, N. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 5:55 am by Ian Allen
The Palestinian Authority, which is based in Ramallah in the West Bank, initially applied for full U.N. membership in 2011, but this effort failed when threatened with a United States veto. [read post]
1 Jun 2024, 8:15 am by Ronald Mann
Dodd-Frank added a provision that says that such a  law is preempted “only if” it “prevents or significantly interferes with the exercise by the national bank of its powers,” and goes on to specify that courts are to apply “the legal standard for preemption in the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in Barnett Bank [v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Sixty years ago, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in United States v. [read post]
5 May 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Article 3 provides that surrender may be refused on the grounds that the person sought is a national of the requested State, but that each party’s Executive Authority–in the case of the United States, the Secretary of State–shall have the power to extradite its nationals, unless prohibited by its domestic legislation, if, in its discretion, it deems it appropriate to do so. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 11:29 am
Fair enough.But the United States decided to go further. [read post]