Search for: "Washington v New York City Bd. of Educ."
Results 1 - 13
of 13
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 May 2012, 3:30 am
Employee’s hope that evidence may be uncovered during discovery is insufficient to reject the employer’s motion for summary judgment Washington v New York City Bd. of Educ., 2012 NY Slip Op 04103, Appellate Division, First Department . [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (Philip Young, Richard Dearing and Devin Slack of counsel), for Bill DeBlasio, Mayor of New York City, New York City Department of Education and Meisha Porter, Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education, respondents.Dennis J. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am
Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (Philip Young, Richard Dearing and Devin Slack of counsel), for Bill DeBlasio, Mayor of New York City, New York City Department of Education and Meisha Porter, Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education, respondents.Dennis J. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 6:44 am
Source: New York Legislative Retrieval System (LRS), Search run September 20, 2009. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 10:46 am
New York Shipping Assn v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 6:32 pm
The Southern District of New York stated that it was “awarding [the defendant] its fees pursuant to 17 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Jan 2021, 8:15 am
Election Bd. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
City of Richmond, 226 U.S. 137, 143–44 (1912); see also Washington ex rel. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 9:36 am
The “Sister Wives” family challenged the law (represented by George Washington University law professor Jonathan Turley), and a federal district court in Utah struck the law down on free exercise clause grounds, largely reasoning that the law was motivated by hostility to polygamist Mormons. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 11:10 pm
Title: Magner v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm
If a new trial occurs, Plaintiff may cross-examine Dr. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
The first is the filing of a lawsuit in federal court by the Governor of Missouri against the People's Republic of China, the Chinese Communist Party and other organs (Missouri v, People's Republic of China). [read post]