Search for: "Word v. U. S" Results 1 - 20 of 2,168
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2025, 6:41 am
" Superior claimed priority and likelihood of confusion with the mark shown below, for footwear, the subject of Superior's pending i-t-u application. [read post]
4 May 2025, 1:39 am by Mayela Celis
Delivering the opinion of the Court, Justice Sotomayor rejected this theory, reading a specific tracing requirement into the wording of the expropriation exception. [read post]
3 May 2025, 8:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The LOC test is asking whether it’s a use of the P’s mark or just the same word. [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 11:04 am by Sasha Volokh
In other words, an innocuous justification cannot transform a facially contentbased law into one that is content neutral. [read post]
17 Apr 2025, 3:26 pm by Josh Blackman
Indeed, in our late Executive's own words, "[u]nless the President did so, anarchy would result. [read post]
17 Apr 2025, 1:34 pm by Eugene Volokh
" Indeed, in our late Executive's own words, "[u]nless the President did so, anarchy would result. [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 5:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The words “legal malpractice” are mentioned only in passing, yet Medical Supply of NY Corp. v State Farm Mut. [read post]
6 Apr 2025, 9:01 pm by renholding
Howey Co.[10] Reves Analysis In Reves, the U. [read post]
4 Apr 2025, 7:25 am by Holly
§ 1052. [3] Gilson LaLonde, Far from Fluent, supra note 1 at 789. [4] Palm Bay Imps., Inc. v. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 8:23 am by Volodymyr Zadorozhnii
The Committee’s internal Charter also does not require it to hold public comment sessions, although it has a long-standing practice of doing so.[33] The Committee’s website indicates it meets quarterly, usually the last week of January, April, July, and October. [read post]