Search for: "Atkinson v. Atkinson"
Results 181 - 200
of 360
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2010, 7:34 am
(IWP) v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 2:37 pm
Atkinson (Cal. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:37 am
Karl V. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 8:33 am
In the well-known 1987 divorce case of Atkinson v Atkinson, the Court of Appeals established the following test for application of the doctrine:[W]e adopt the doctrine of equitable parent and find that a husband who is not the biological father of a child born or conceived during the marriage may be considered the natural father of that child where (1) the husband and the child mutually acknowledge a relationship as father and child, or the mother of the child has… [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 9:23 am
In the well-known 1987 divorce case of Atkinson v Atkinson, the Court of Appeals established the following test for application of the doctrine:[W]e adopt the doctrine of equitable parent and find that a husband who is not the biological father of a child born or conceived during the marriage may be considered the natural father of that child where (1) the husband and the child mutually acknowledge a relationship as father and child, or the mother of the child has… [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 6:16 am
” Atkinson v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 9:23 am
In the well-known 1987 divorce case of Atkinson v Atkinson, the Court of Appeals established the following test for application of the doctrine:[W]e adopt the doctrine of equitable parent and find that a husband who is not the biological father of a child born or conceived during the marriage may be considered the natural father of that child where (1) the husband and the child mutually acknowledge a relationship as father and child, or the mother of the child has… [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 6:54 am
Atkinson, 369 U.S. 527]. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 3:52 am
The authors also pointed out that, at the time of writing, R v Hunter, MacKinder and Atkinson [1974] 1 QB 95, [1973] 3 All ER 286 CA appeared to be the first example since the late nineteenth century of a prosecution for the offence. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 10:08 am
The case is United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 2:30 pm
RBC General Insurance Co. v. [read post]
Summary dismissal of an action may not be appropriate when an investigation of the facts is required
9 Jun 2012, 1:33 pm
Sussey v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 5:35 pm
Chris Atkinson, annoyed at missing out on last year's haiku competition, gave us this: ""I love IP dispute resolution because ... [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:01 pm
Indeed, the majority opinion doesn’t contain a single mention of last month’s NRA v. [read post]
7 Jun 2024, 6:44 am
Atkinson, Inc. v Lutin Central Services Co., Inc. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 6:17 pm
Atkinson, 369 U.S. 527, 1962 AMC 1131 (1962). [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 10:58 am
Foreign Relations in FRUS”Erin Ford Cozens, Office of the Historian, Department of State, “From Page to Book: Publishing the Foreign Relations series”Internships and Fellowships in the Federal Government: Experiences in History OfficesChair, Anne MusellaDanielle Dulken, American University, “National Coalition for History”Michael Goodwin, Florida Atlantic University, “US Senate Historical Office”Julie Prieto, Army Center for Military History, “The… [read post]
25 Oct 2023, 2:33 pm
From Potts v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 9:00 am
P. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 6:00 am
Atkinson, 369 U.S. 527, 532 (1962). [read post]
