Search for: "B. v. S."
Results 181 - 200
of 51,874
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jun 2009, 2:35 am
Official Receiver v McKay [2009] EWCA Civ 467; [2009] WLR (D) 191 “Where the only proven debt against a bankrupt's estate had been withdrawn by the creditor for whatever reason, the court was empowered under s 282(1)(b) of the Insolvency Act 1986 to annul the bankruptcy order on the footing that the proven debt no longer [...] [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 5:17 am
In Matter of Brady S v Darla B, the court was asked to decide whether it was in the best interests of the child to award sole custody to the grandparents or to the child’s father. [read post]
26 May 2020, 5:46 pm
In United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 6:14 am
Steinberg, Alexander B. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:44 pm
A Very Brief History of 11(b)Without entering into an in-depth discussion of the historical case law of associated with s. 11(b), or analyzing the new changes, it is important to note that R. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 3:39 am
Susan V. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 6:38 pm
We therefore affirm the bankruptcy court’s determination that the award of $123,000 under § 7031(b) is dischargeable. [read post]
12 Aug 2007, 7:39 am
" Defendants therefore explain that, although (b)(2) does not have a "predominance" requirement, (b)(2) does require that the class's claims be "cohesive. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:44 pm
A Very Brief History of 11(b)Without entering into an in-depth discussion of the historical case law of associated with s. 11(b), or analyzing the new changes, it is important to note that R. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:18 am
London Borough of Southwark v Hyacienth 22.12.2011 is that incredibly rare, beautiful thing: a successful gateway (b) defence to a mandatory possession claim in relation to an introductory tenancy. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:18 am
London Borough of Southwark v Hyacienth 22.12.2011 is that incredibly rare, beautiful thing: a successful gateway (b) defence to a mandatory possession claim in relation to an introductory tenancy. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:49 am
Regina v Braithwaite [2010] EWCA Crim 1082; [2010] WLR (D) 141 “Material contained in police crime reports that unproven allegations had been made against a person who was someone other than a defendant, or that that person had been investigated in respect of an offence, would rarely be of substantial probative value to an issue at trial sufficient to render it admissible as evidence of bad character against that person pursuant to s 100(1)(b) of the Criminal Justice… [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm
The question in this case is whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.To discuss the case, we have Michael Carvin, who is a Partner at Jones Day.- See more at:… [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 2:22 pm
The question in this case is whether Congress’s 2006 decision to reauthorize Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act under the pre-existing coverage formula of Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act exceeded its authority under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments and thus violated the Tenth Amendment and Article IV of the United States Constitution.To discuss the case, we have Michael Carvin, who is a Partner at Jones Day.- See more at:… [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 12:33 am
Two years later, in Minor v. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 7:30 am
Section 8.01-335(B) permits reinstatement of a plaintiff’s case within one year of its dismissal under that statute for three-plus years of inactivity. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 8:35 pm
" In Global-Tech v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 2:48 am
Jamie S. v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 2:00 am
According to the Court, that’s not the end of the story because in Federal Housing Administration v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:29 pm
This morning the Court heard oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
