Search for: "Content Admin"
Results 181 - 200
of 636
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2013, 2:14 pm
Where Topify Went Wrong The controversy over Topify began to ignite in late may when users at a The Admin Zone forum, a forum for forum administrators, noticed that Topify, which was new to them at the time, appeared to be scraping content from hundreds, if not thousands, of forums and putting them in the app. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 10:04 am
In short, there is a ton of potential here, even more so now, but there is still a lot of work to be done, something I think the admins know very well. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 10:42 am
At the DMV admin per se hearing, Coffey hired an expert to testify that Coffey’s blood alcohol content was rising at the time of her DUI arrest. [read post]
6 Sep 2019, 12:14 am
On 4 September 2019 the Administrative Court (Haddon-Cave LJ and Swift J) handed down judgment in the case of R (Bridges) v Chief Constable of the South Wales Police [2019] EWHC 2341 (Admin). [read post]
7 Jul 2012, 12:16 pm
May, R (on the application of) v Birmingham City Council [2012] EWHC 1399 (Admin)When can a Local Authority refuse to accept an application as homeless? [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:13 am
The "sweeping preliminary injunction" governs "thousands of federal officials’ and employees’ speech concerning any content posted on any social-media platform by anyone," Prelogar said. [read post]
26 May 2023, 9:26 am
It is difficult to understand how a system of mandatory payments imposed on only a subset of content providers could be enforced without undermining net neutrality. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
ENDNOTES [1] SEC Administrative Proceeding No. 3-21829 (Jan. 16, 2024), https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2024/34-99344.pdf. [2] 17 CFR §240.21F-17 (2011). [3] SEC Administrative Proceeding No. 3-21829 at 3 (Jan. 16, 2024), https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2024/34-99344.pdf. [4] SEC Administrative Proceeding No. 3-21829 at 4 (Jan. 16, 2024),… [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:00 am
” Human Resources Admin., v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 6:00 am
” Human Resources Admin., v. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 8:16 am
According to the paper, DRM only punishes legitimate customers, driving many to pirate content so they can use their acquired content in the manner they want. [read post]
31 Oct 2024, 1:28 pm
It’s the number one content management system for a reason. [read post]
30 Sep 2024, 6:27 am
Positive friction enhances understanding: Contrary to conventional wisdom, adding "positive friction" - encouraging deeper engagement with key information - improved overall comprehension by 28%, rising to 59% for specific interactive content.4. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 3:52 am
BASCA v Secretary of State for Innovation and Skills [2015] EWHC 1723 (Admin) [read post]
2 Feb 2019, 5:59 am
This may concern anyone from creators, to public bodies or content publishers – individual and organisations alike. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 2:30 am
Rules of Judicial Admin., 372 So. 2d 449, 449 (Fla. 1979)Because they are rules enacted by one court to guide the actions of another court and the officers of the court, they have no, none, nada, jurisdiction over Pepe and Maria Q Public who wandered in to watch a scintillating disorderly conduct trial. [read post]
16 Jan 2017, 5:44 pm
Post Grant Admin: Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 1:56 pm
While they can be rebooted, it’s unclear how simple it is for the admins and if it can be done without exposing the admins of the site to legal risk. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 3:57 am
June 30, 2010): Our conclusion that the prompt administrative hearing provided under sections 14602.6 and 22852 satisfies the requirements of due process dispenses also with Alviso's contention that the impoundment provisions authorize an unlawful seizure in violation of the state and federal Constitutions, which rests on the same premise--i.e., that the Constitution requires post-seizure judicial review. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 9:29 am
(credit: Getty Images | Bloomberg) The Supreme Court has blocked an injunction that would prevent the Biden administration from pressuring social media firms to take down content. [read post]
