Search for: "Cook v. Superior Court"
Results 181 - 200
of 232
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2024, 2:10 pm
App. 5th 721 (2022), the Los Angeles Superior Court sustained defendants’ omnibus demurrer without leave to amend, finding that because cooking in air fryers only generates acrylamide in certain kinds of food and not all, defendants were not obligated to provide a Prop 65 warning. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:47 am
Our friend and colleague Marius Adomnica (Gratl & Company) has written this good case note on the recent Tim Hortons class action case in Ontario: The Ontario Superior Court of Justice recently released its reasons striking the Plaintiffs’ claim in Fairview Donut Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 11:51 am
C.A.), Brooke J.A. stated: The question of when and in what circumstances the court may order such a sale was considered broadly by Grant J. in Cook v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 10:11 pm
The Superior Court granted the petition for habeas corpus and the California Court of Appeals reversed. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 12:59 pm
A superior court judge denied the motion and the defendant pled guilty and appealed. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 12:59 pm
A superior court judge denied the motion and the defendant pled guilty and appealed. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 9:03 am
Cooke, 94 N.C. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 3:00 am
Ltd v Underworks Ptd. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 6:30 am
Seila Law LLC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2015, 7:17 pm
Williams v. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 2:00 pm
In Briseno v. [read post]
16 May 2020, 4:36 am
In a preliminary settlement filed in San Mateo Superior Court, the social network agreed to pay damages to American moderators and provide more counseling to them while they work. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 7:30 pm
In the Courts The hearing of the appeal in Ambrosadiou v Coward took place on Monday 21 March 2011. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
Austin v. [read post]
1 Oct 2024, 5:06 pm
ATF declares that its Final Rule at issue before the Supreme Court in Garland v. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 8:00 am
Harris v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 6:30 am
Nonetheless, the Supreme Court has issued decisions making any such reforms difficult to adopt and enforce. [read post]
24 Apr 2011, 10:52 am
Mattel argued that the list of examples in the contract were illustrative not exclusive, but the Court held that "ideas" are "markedly different from the list of examples including discoveries, improvements and designs" (People ex rel Lungren v superior Court (1996)). [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 4:11 am
Bethea, 718 A.2d 1187, 1190-95 (Md. 1998) (attorney malpractice action was not barred on the grounds of nonmutual collateral estoppel because it is unjust to preclude a malpractice action when the clients may have been misinformed as to the actual worth of their case); Cook v. [read post]
